» Articles » PMID: 30451041

Dual Mobility Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties: Trend over Time in Use, Patient Characteristics, and Mid-term Revision in 3,038 Cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2016)

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Nov 20
PMID 30451041
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background and purpose - We noticed an increased use of dual mobility cups (DMC) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) despite limited knowledge of implant longevity. Therefore, we determined the trend over time and mid-term cup revision rates of DMC compared with unipolar cups (UC) in primary THA. Patients and methods - All primary THA registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) during 2007-2016 were included (n = 215,953) and divided into 2 groups - DMC THA (n = 3,038) and UC THA (n = 212,915). Crude competing risk and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed with cup revision for any reason as primary endpoint. Adjustments were made for sex, age, diagnosis at primary THA, previous operation, ASA score, type of fixation, surgical approach, and femoral head size. Results - The proportion of primary DMC THA increased from 0.8% (n = 184) in 2010 to 2.6% (n = 740) in 2016. Patients who underwent DMC THA more often had a previous operation on the affected hip, a higher ASA score, and the diagnosis acute fracture or late posttraumatic status compared with the UC THA group. Overall 5-year cup revision rate was 1.5% (95% CI 1.0-2.3) for DMC and 1.4% (CI 1.3-1.4) for UC THA. Stratified analyses for patient characteristics showed no differences in cup revision rates between the 2 groups. Multivariable regression analyses showed no statistically significantly increased risk for revision for DMC THA (HR 0.9 [0.6-1.2]). Interpretation - The use of primary DMC THA increased with differences in patient characteristics. The 5-year cup revision rates for DMC THA and UC THA were comparable.

Citing Articles

The Avantage ® dual mobility cup in primary total hip arthroplasty: A registry study.

Castiello E, Bruschi A, Bordini B, De Gaetano F, Tigani D J Orthop. 2024; 56:98-102.

PMID: 38828468 PMC: 11137359. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.010.


Femoral Neck Design Does Not Impact Revision Risk After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Dual Mobility Cup.

van Dooren B, Peters R, Visser D, Van Steenbergen L, Bos P, Zijlstra W Arthroplast Today. 2024; 25:101281.

PMID: 38292143 PMC: 10826135. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101281.


Modular dual mobility articulation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty: lights and shadows.

Moghnie A, Tigani D, Consoli A, Castiello E, Ganci M, Amendola L J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):278.

PMID: 37020227 PMC: 10074885. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03730-8.


Cemented and cementless dual mobility cups show similar fixation, low polyethylene wear, and low serum cobalt-chromium in elderly patients: a randomized radiostereometry study with 6 years' follow-up.

Jorgensen P, Tabori-Jensen S, Mechlenburg I, Homilius M, Hansen T, Stilling M Acta Orthop. 2022; 93:906-913.

PMID: 36545926 PMC: 9772923. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.5761.


Late Breakage of a Dual-Mobility Polyethylene Insert in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Unusual Failure Mode.

Rodriguez Perez D, Agullo Ferre J, Del Carmen Rodriguez M, Monsonet C Arthroplast Today. 2021; 12:7-11.

PMID: 34746346 PMC: 8551416. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.013.


References
1.
Mukka S, Mahmood S, Sjoden G, Sayed-Noor A . Dual mobility cups for preventing early hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients at risk: experience in a county hospital. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013; 5(2):48-51. PMC: 3718234. DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e10. View

2.
Gundtoft P, Overgaard S, Schonheyder H, Moller J, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen A . The "true" incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86(3):326-34. PMC: 4443464. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1011983. View

3.
Osmon D, Berbari E, Berendt A, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg J . Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 56(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis966. View

4.
Radtke K, Tetzlaff T, Vaske B, Ettinger M, Claassen L, Florkemeier T . Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary and after revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Technol Health Care. 2016; 24(5):721-8. DOI: 10.3233/THC-161158. View

5.
Chughtai M, Mistry J, Diedrich A, Jauregui J, Elmallah R, Bonutti P . Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(10):2181-7. PMC: 5014802. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4811-6. View