» Articles » PMID: 30443103

The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss

Overview
Journal Semin Hear
Date 2018 Nov 17
PMID 30443103
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Substantial loss of cochlear function is required to elevate pure-tone thresholds to the severe hearing loss range; yet, individuals with severe or profound hearing loss continue to rely on hearing for communication. Despite the impairment, sufficient information is encoded at the periphery to make acoustic hearing a viable option. However, the probability of significant cochlear and/or neural damage associated with the loss has consequences for sound perception and speech recognition. These consequences include degraded frequency selectivity, which can be assessed with tests including psychoacoustic tuning curves and broadband rippled stimuli. Because speech recognition depends on the ability to resolve frequency detail, a listener with severe hearing loss is likely to have impaired communication in both quiet and noisy environments. However, the extent of the impairment varies widely among individuals. A better understanding of the fundamental abilities of listeners with severe and profound hearing loss and the consequences of those abilities for communication can support directed treatment options in this population.

Citing Articles

Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Turton L, Souza P, Thibodeau L, Hickson L, Gifford R, Bird J Semin Hear. 2020; 41(3):141-246.

PMID: 33364673 PMC: 7744249. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714744.


Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Souza P, Gallun F, Wright R J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(1):334-344.

PMID: 31940258 PMC: 7213489. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00176.


Persistent Hearing Loss among World Trade Center Health Registry Residents, Passersby and Area Workers, 2006-2007.

Cone J, Stein C, Lee D, Flamme G, Brite J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(20).

PMID: 31614778 PMC: 6848920. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203864.

References
1.
Drullman R, Festen J, PLOMP R . Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994; 95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. DOI: 10.1121/1.409836. View

2.
Thornton A, Abbas P . Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 67(2):638-43. DOI: 10.1121/1.383888. View

3.
Lyxell B, Andersson U, Borg E, Ohlsson I . Working-memory capacity and phonological processing in deafened adults and individuals with a severe hearing impairment. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 1:S86-9. DOI: 10.3109/14992020309074628. View

4.
Otsuka S, Furukawa S, Yamagishi S, Hirota K, Kashino M . Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016; 17(6):541-557. PMC: 5112215. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0581-9. View

5.
ZWICKER E, Schorn K . Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiology. 1978; 17(2):120-40. DOI: 10.3109/00206097809080039. View