» Articles » PMID: 30425432

Biochemical Diversity Evaluation in Chickpea Accessions Employing Mini-core Collection

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Nov 15
PMID 30425432
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The seeds of chickpea provide an exceptional source of dietary proteins and is one of the important legumes in both developed and developing countries over the world. The available germplasm of cultivated chickpea is deficient in desired biochemical signatures. To identify new sources of variations for breeding, reduced subsets of germplasm such as mini-core collection can be explored as an effective resource. In the present investigation, mini-core collections consisting of 215 accessions of chickpea were extensively evaluated for tapping biochemical diversity. Analysis included ten biochemical parameters comprising total protein, total free amino acids, phytic acid, tannin, total phenolics, total flavonoids, lectin, DPPH radical scavenging activity, in vitro digestibility of protein and starch. The spectrum of diversity was documented for total protein (4.60-33.90%), total free amino acids (0.092-9.33 mg/g), phytic acid (0.009-4.06 mg/g), tannin (0.232-189.63 mg/g), total phenolics (0.15-0.81 mg/g), total flavonoids (0.04-1.57 mg/g), lectin (0.07-330.32 HU/mg), DPPH radical scavenging activity (26.74-49.11%), in vitro protein digestibility (59.45-76.22%) and in vitro starch digestibility (45.63-298.39 mg of maltose/g). The principal component analysis revealed association of chickpea higher protein content to the lower level of total phenolics and flavonoid contents. The dendrogram obtained by unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average cluster analysis grouped the chickpea accessions into two major clusters. This is the first comprehensive report on biochemical diversity analysed in the mini-core chickpea accessions. The ultimate purpose of conducting such studies was to deliver information on nutritional characteristics for effective breeding programmes. Depending on the objectives of the breeding aforesaid accessions could be employed as a parent.

Citing Articles

Diversity of Major Yield Traits and Nutritional Components Among Greenhouse Grown Chickpea ( L.) Breeding Lines, Landraces, and Cultivars of Different Origins.

Choi Y, Yoon H, Shin M, Lee S, Yi J, Wang X Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39519996 PMC: 11548202. DOI: 10.3390/plants13213078.


Unlocking the nutritional potential of chickpea: strategies for biofortification and enhanced multinutrient quality.

Jha U, Nayyar H, Thudi M, Beena R, Prasad P, Siddique K Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1391496.

PMID: 38911976 PMC: 11190093. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1391496.


Unveiling Diversity for Quality Traits in the Indian Landraces of Horsegram [ (Lam.) Verdc.].

Kumari M, Padhi S, Chourey S, Kondal V, Thakare S, Negi A Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38005699 PMC: 10675608. DOI: 10.3390/plants12223803.


Validating the Nutraceutical Significance of Minor Millets by Employing Nutritional-Antinutritional Profiling.

Rana S, Tiwari S, Gupta N, Tripathi M, Tripathi N, Singh S Life (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37763321 PMC: 10532853. DOI: 10.3390/life13091918.


Chickpea Peptide: A Nutraceutical Molecule Corroborating Neurodegenerative and ACE-I Inhibition.

Gupta N, Quazi S, Jha S, Siddiqi M, Verma K, Sharma S Nutrients. 2022; 14(22).

PMID: 36432511 PMC: 9692729. DOI: 10.3390/nu14224824.


References
1.
Reddy N, Sathe S, Salunkhe D . Phytates in legumes and cereals. Adv Food Res. 1982; 28:1-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2628(08)60110-x. View

2.
Yao Y, Sang W, Zhou M, Ren G . Phenolic composition and antioxidant activities of 11 celery cultivars. J Food Sci. 2010; 75(1):C9-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01392.x. View

3.
Tan G, Das Bhowmik S, Hoang T, Karbaschi M, Johnson A, Williams B . Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:1755. PMC: 5646179. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01755. View

4.
Chitra U, Singh U, Rao P . Phytic acid, in vitro protein digestibility, dietary fiber, and minerals of pulses as influenced by processing methods. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1996; 49(4):307-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF01091980. View

5.
Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H . Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004; 74(17):2157-84. PMC: 7126989. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047. View