» Articles » PMID: 30423072

Off-target Predictions in CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing Using Deep Learning

Overview
Journal Bioinformatics
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Nov 14
PMID 30423072
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Motivation: The prediction of off-target mutations in CRISPR-Cas9 is a hot topic due to its relevance to gene editing research. Existing prediction methods have been developed; however, most of them just calculated scores based on mismatches to the guide sequence in CRISPR-Cas9. Therefore, the existing prediction methods are unable to scale and improve their performance with the rapid expansion of experimental data in CRISPR-Cas9. Moreover, the existing methods still cannot satisfy enough precision in off-target predictions for gene editing at the clinical level.

Results: To address it, we design and implement two algorithms using deep neural networks to predict off-target mutations in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing (i.e. deep convolutional neural network and deep feedforward neural network). The models were trained and tested on the recently released off-target dataset, CRISPOR dataset, for performance benchmark. Another off-target dataset identified by GUIDE-seq was adopted for additional evaluation. We demonstrate that convolutional neural network achieves the best performance on CRISPOR dataset, yielding an average classification area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 97.2% under stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Interestingly, the deep feedforward neural network can also be competitive at the average AUC of 97.0% under the same setting. We compare the two deep neural network models with the state-of-the-art off-target prediction methods (i.e. CFD, MIT, CROP-IT, and CCTop) and three traditional machine learning models (i.e. random forest, gradient boosting trees, and logistic regression) on both datasets in terms of AUC values, demonstrating the competitive edges of the proposed algorithms. Additional analyses are conducted to investigate the underlying reasons from different perspectives.

Availability And Implementation: The example code are available at https://github.com/MichaelLinn/off_target_prediction. The related datasets are available at https://github.com/MichaelLinn/off_target_prediction/tree/master/data.

Citing Articles

Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.

Abbasi A, Asim M, Dengel A J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):153.

PMID: 39905452 PMC: 11796103. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06013-w.


Appraisal of CRISPR Technology as an Innovative Screening to Therapeutic Toolkit for Genetic Disorders.

Shahid A, Zahra A, Aslam S, Shamim A, Ali W, Aslam B Mol Biotechnol. 2025; .

PMID: 39894889 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-025-01374-z.


Predicting CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human primary cells using bidirectional LSTM with BERT embedding.

Sari O, Liu Z, Pan Y, Shao X Bioinform Adv. 2025; 5(1):vbae184.

PMID: 39758829 PMC: 11696696. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae184.


DTMP-prime: A deep transformer-based model for predicting prime editing efficiency and PegRNA activity.

Alipanahi R, Safari L, Khanteymoori A Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024; 35(4):102370.

PMID: 39654539 PMC: 11626815. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102370.


The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.

Chakraborty S, Ray Dutta J, Ganesan R, Minary P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:241-300.

PMID: 39312149 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_17.


References
1.
Ma H, Marti-Gutierrez N, Park S, Wu J, Lee Y, Suzuki K . Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos. Nature. 2017; 548(7668):413-419. DOI: 10.1038/nature23305. View

2.
Al-Attar S, Westra E, van der Oost J, Brouns S . Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs): the hallmark of an ingenious antiviral defense mechanism in prokaryotes. Biol Chem. 2011; 392(4):277-89. DOI: 10.1515/BC.2011.042. View

3.
Shalem O, Sanjana N, Hartenian E, Shi X, Scott D, Mikkelson T . Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science. 2013; 343(6166):84-87. PMC: 4089965. DOI: 10.1126/science.1247005. View

4.
Tsai S, Zheng Z, Nguyen N, Liebers M, Topkar V, Thapar V . GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 33(2):187-197. PMC: 4320685. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3117. View

5.
Ran F, Hsu P, Lin C, Gootenberg J, Konermann S, Trevino A . Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013; 154(6):1380-9. PMC: 3856256. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021. View