CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage Efficiency Correlates Strongly with Target-sgRNA Folding Stability: from Physical Mechanism to Off-target Assessment

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2017 Mar 10

PMID 28273945

Citations 31

Authors

Xiaojun Xu

Dongsheng Duan

Shi-Jie Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 complex, a bacterial immune response system, has been widely adopted for RNA-guided genome editing and transcription regulation in applications such as targeted genome modification and site-directed mutagenesis. However, the physical basis for its target specificity is not fully understood. In this study, based on a statistical mechanical analysis for the whole ensemble of sgRNA-target complex conformations, we identify a strong correlation between Cas9 cleavage efficiency and the stability of the DNA-RNA (R-loop) complex structures, with a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.775 to 0.886 for the tested systems. The finding leads to quantitative insights into important experimental results, such as the greater Cas9 tolerance to single-base mismatches in PAM-distal region than to PAM-proximal region and the high specificity and efficiency for shorter protospacers. Moreover, the results from the genome-wide off-target assessments, compared with other off-target scoring tools, indicate that the statistical mechanics-based approach provides more reliable off-target analyses and sgRNA design. To facilitate the genome engineering applications, a new web-based tool for genome-wide off-target assessment is established.

Citing Articles

CRISPRlnc: a machine learning method for lncRNA-specific single-guide RNA design of CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Yang Z, Zhang Z, Li J, Chen W, Liu C Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38426328 PMC: 10905519. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae066.

Machine learning in the estimation of CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage sites for plant system.

Das J, Kumar S, Mishra D, Chaturvedi K, Paul R, Kairi A Front Genet. 2023; 13:1085332.

PMID: 36699447 PMC: 9868961. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1085332.

Elevated expression of exogenous RAD51 enhances the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing efficiency.

Park S, Yoon S, Choi E, Hyeon H, Lee K, Kim K BMB Rep. 2022; 56(2):102-107.

PMID: 36513383 PMC: 9978361.

Online Databases of Genome Editing in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.

Carrillo-Rodriguez P, Martinez-Lopez J, Gomez-Hernandez L, Boraita-Morales L, Uceda-Molina M, Cuenca-Bermejo I Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022; 1396:19-33.

PMID: 36454457 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5642-3_2.

Accounting for small variations in the tracrRNA sequence improves sgRNA activity predictions for CRISPR screening.

DeWeirdt P, McGee A, Zheng F, Nwolah I, Hegde M, Doench J Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):5255.

PMID: 36068235 PMC: 9448816. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33024-2.

References

Tsai S, Joung J . Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(5):300-12. PMC: 7225572. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.28. View

Nelson C, Hakim C, Ousterout D, Thakore P, Moreb E, Castellanos Rivera R . In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science. 2016; 351(6271):403-7. PMC: 4883596. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5143. View

Shalem O, Sanjana N, Zhang F . High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16(5):299-311. PMC: 4503232. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3899. View

Wu X, Scott D, Kriz A, Chiu A, Hsu P, Dadon D . Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(7):670-6. PMC: 4145672. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2889. View

Fu Y, Sander J, Reyon D, Cascio V, Joung J . Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(3):279-284. PMC: 3988262. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2808. View

Zhang J, Li X, Neises A, Chen W, Hu L, Ji G . Different Effects of sgRNA Length on CRISPR-mediated Gene Knockout Efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:28566. PMC: 4919781. DOI: 10.1038/srep28566. View

Xiong X, Chen M, Lim W, Zhao D, Qi L . CRISPR/Cas9 for Human Genome Engineering and Disease Research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016; 17:131-54. PMC: 10216851. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022258. View

Doudna J, Charpentier E . Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014; 346(6213):1258096. DOI: 10.1126/science.1258096. View

Long C, McAnally J, Shelton J, Mireault A, Bassel-Duby R, Olson E . Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of germline DNA. Science. 2014; 345(6201):1184-1188. PMC: 4398027. DOI: 10.1126/science.1254445. View

10.

Stemmer M, Thumberger T, Del Sol Keyer M, Wittbrodt J, Mateo J . CCTop: An Intuitive, Flexible and Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Target Prediction Tool. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124633. PMC: 4409221. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124633. View

11.

Nishimasu H, Ran F, Hsu P, Konermann S, Shehata S, Dohmae N . Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell. 2014; 156(5):935-49. PMC: 4139937. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001. View

12.

Kleinstiver B, Prew M, Tsai S, Topkar V, Nguyen N, Zheng Z . Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. 2015; 523(7561):481-5. PMC: 4540238. DOI: 10.1038/nature14592. View

13.

Tsai S, Zheng Z, Nguyen N, Liebers M, Topkar V, Thapar V . GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 33(2):187-197. PMC: 4320685. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3117. View

14.

Sugimoto N, Nakano S, Katoh M, Matsumura A, Nakamuta H, Ohmichi T . Thermodynamic parameters to predict stability of RNA/DNA hybrid duplexes. Biochemistry. 1995; 34(35):11211-6. DOI: 10.1021/bi00035a029. View

15.

Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M . Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature. 2014; 513(7519):569-73. PMC: 4176945. DOI: 10.1038/nature13579. View

16.

Doench J, Fusi N, Sullender M, Hegde M, Vaimberg E, Donovan K . Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(2):184-191. PMC: 4744125. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3437. View

17.

Hsu P, Lander E, Zhang F . Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014; 157(6):1262-1278. PMC: 4343198. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010. View

18.

Barrangou R, Doudna J . Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9):933-941. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3659. View

19.

Hsu P, Scott D, Weinstein J, Ran F, Konermann S, Agarwala V . DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(9):827-32. PMC: 3969858. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2647. View

20.

Josephs E, Kocak D, Fitzgibbon C, McMenemy J, Gersbach C, Marszalek P . Structure and specificity of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 during DNA interrogation, target binding and cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(18):8924-41. PMC: 4605321. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv892. View