» Articles » PMID: 30422863

Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative

Abstract

Objectives: Patients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism.

Design: We sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existing operational models of peer support, among the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive Peer Support Collaborative. We also sought to categorize key distinctions between these models and elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Subjects And Setting: Seventeen Thrive sites from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were represented by a range of healthcare professionals.

Measurements And Main Results: Via an iterative process of in-person and email/conference calls, members of the Collaborative defined the key areas on which peer support models could be defined and compared, collected detailed self-reports from all sites, reviewed the information, and identified clusters of models. Barriers and challenges to implementation of peer support models were also documented. Within the Thrive Collaborative, six general models of peer support were identified: community based, psychologist-led outpatient, models-based within ICU follow-up clinics, online, groups based within ICU, and peer mentor models. The most common barriers to implementation were recruitment to groups, personnel input and training, sustainability and funding, risk management, and measuring success.

Conclusions: A number of different models of peer support are currently being developed to help patients and families recover and grow in the postcritical care setting.

Citing Articles

Digital health interventions in adult intensive care and recovery after critical illness to promote survivorship care.

da Silva A, Merolli M, Fini N, Granger C, Gustafson O, Parry S J Intensive Care Soc. 2025; 26(1):96-104.

PMID: 39764433 PMC: 11700390. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241311105.


Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.

Stewart J, Pauley E, Wilson D, Bradley J, Hart N, McAuley D J Intensive Care Soc. 2025; 26(1):80-95.

PMID: 39758281 PMC: 11699563. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241308674.


Long-term prevalence of PTSD symptom in family members of severe COVID-19 patients: a serial follow-up study extending to 18 months after ICU discharge.

Nosaka N, Noguchi A, Takeuchi T, Wakabayashi K J Intensive Care. 2024; 12(1):53.

PMID: 39695911 PMC: 11653928. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-024-00765-9.


Peer-Delivered Interventions for Caregivers in the ICU with a Focus on Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Reichman M, Grunberg V, Presciutti A, Foster K, Vranceanu A, Creutzfeldt C Neurocrit Care. 2024; .

PMID: 39242438 PMC: 11885583. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02115-x.


Parents' Experiences Caring for a Child after a Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study.

Olson L, Perry G, Yang S, Galyean P, Zickmund S, Sorenson S J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2024; 13(2):127-133.

PMID: 38919699 PMC: 11196146. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740450.


References
1.
McPeake J, Devine H, MacTavish P, Fleming L, Crawford R, Struthers R . Caregiver strain following critical care discharge: An exploratory evaluation. J Crit Care. 2016; 35:180-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.023. View

2.
Brummett B, Barefoot J, Siegler I, Lytle B, Bosworth H, Williams Jr R . Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med. 2001; 63(2):267-72. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00010. View

3.
Elliott D, Davidson J, Harvey M, Bemis-Dougherty A, Hopkins R, Iwashyna T . Exploring the scope of post-intensive care syndrome therapy and care: engagement of non-critical care providers and survivors in a second stakeholders meeting. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42(12):2518-26. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000525. View

4.
McPeake J, Shaw M, Iwashyna T, Daniel M, Devine H, Jarvie L . Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE). Early evaluation of a complex intervention. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0188028. PMC: 5706708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188028. View

5.
Mehlhorn J, Freytag A, Schmidt K, Brunkhorst F, Graf J, Troitzsch U . Rehabilitation interventions for postintensive care syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42(5):1263-71. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000148. View