» Articles » PMID: 30412606

Declines in Exercise Performance Are Prevented 24 Hours After Post-exercise Ischemic Conditioning in Amateur Cyclists

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Nov 10
PMID 30412606
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brief moments of blood flow occlusion followed by reperfusion may promote enhancements in exercise performance. Thus, this study assessed the 24-h effect of post-exercise ischemic conditioning (PEIC) on exercise performance and physiological variables in trained cyclists. In a randomized, single-blind study, 28 trained cyclists (27.1 ± 1.4 years) performed a maximal incremental cycling test (MICT). The outcome measures were creatine kinase (CK), muscle soreness and perceived recovery status, heart rate, perceived exertion and power output. Immediately after the MICT, the cyclists performed 1 of the following 4 interventions: 2 sessions of 5-min occlusion/5-min reperfusion (PEIC or SHAM, 2 x 5) or 5 sessions of 2-min occlusion/2-min reperfusion (PEIC or SHAM, 5 x 2). The PEIC (50 mm Hg above the systolic blood pressure) or SHAM (20 mm Hg) treatment was applied unilaterally on alternating thighs. At 24 h after the interventions, a second MICT was performed. In all the groups, the CK levels were increased compared with the baseline (p < 0.05) after the 24-h MICT. The PEIC groups (2 x 5 and 5 x 2) felt more tired at 24 h post intervention (p < 0.05). However, both PEIC groups maintained their performance (2 x 5: p = 0.819; 5 x 2: p = 0.790), while the SHAM groups exhibited decreased performance at 24 h post intervention compared to baseline (2 x 5: p = 0.015; 5 x 2: p = 0.045). A decrease in the maximal heart rate (HR) was found only in the SHAM 2 x 5 group (p = 0.015). There were no other significant differences in the heart rate, power output or perceived exertion after 24 h compared with the baseline values for any of the interventions (p > 0.05). In conclusion, PEIC led to maintained exercise performance 24 h post intervention in trained cyclists.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Local Muscle Oxygen Saturation: Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols and the Myth of Overcompensation.

Marocolo M, Arriel R, Guedes G, Meireles A, Krzysztofik M, Chycki J J Hum Kinet. 2025; 95:71-82.

PMID: 39944970 PMC: 11812166. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/194066.


Does ischemic preconditioning enhance sports performance more than placebo or no intervention? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Souza H, Oliveira G, Meireles A, Dos Santos M, Vieira J, Arriel R J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:101010.

PMID: 39536913 PMC: 11880722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101010.


Blood flow restriction as a post-exercise recovery strategy: A systematic review of the current status of the literature.

Oliva-Lozano J, Patterson S, Chiampas G, Maybury E, Cost R Biol Sport. 2024; 41(3):191-200.

PMID: 38952909 PMC: 11167478. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.133664.


Current Aspects of Selected Factors to Modulate Brain Health and Sports Performance in Athletes.

Przewlocka K, Korewo-Labelle D, Berezka P, Karnia M, Kaczor J Nutrients. 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38931198 PMC: 11206260. DOI: 10.3390/nu16121842.


The Acute Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Short-Duration Cycling: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Nelson C, Brand C, Chitty M, Birger C, Scholten S Int J Exerc Sci. 2023; 16(6):148-158.

PMID: 37114118 PMC: 10124725. DOI: 10.70252/EGXC5574.


References
1.
Saghaei M . Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004; 4:26. PMC: 533876. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26. View

2.
Johnsen J, Pryds K, Salman R, Lofgren B, Kristiansen S, Botker H . The remote ischemic preconditioning algorithm: effect of number of cycles, cycle duration and effector organ mass on efficacy of protection. Basic Res Cardiol. 2016; 111(2):10. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-016-0529-6. View

3.
Seeger J, Timmers S, Ploegmakers D, Cable N, Hopman M, Thijssen D . Is delayed ischemic preconditioning as effective on running performance during a 5km time trial as acute IPC?. J Sci Med Sport. 2016; 20(2):208-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.03.010. View

4.
De Groot P, Thijssen D, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman M . Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 108(1):141-6. PMC: 2793394. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1195-2. View

5.
Marocolo I, Ribeiro da Mota G, Londe A, Patterson S, Barbosa Neto O, Marocolo M . Acute ischemic preconditioning does not influence high-intensity intermittent exercise performance. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e4118. PMC: 5712465. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4118. View