» Articles » PMID: 30410707

Possible Role of Nanocarriers in Drug Delivery Against Cervical Cancer

Overview
Journal Nano Rev Exp
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2018 Nov 10
PMID 30410707
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer and the largest cancer killer among women in most developing countries including India. Although, various drugs have been developed for cervical cancer, treatment with these drugs often results in a number of undesirable side effects, toxicity and multidrug resistance (MDR). Also, the outcomes for cervical cancer patients remain poor after surgery and chemo radiation. A literature search (for drugs and delivery systems against cervical cancer) was performed on PubMed and through Google. The present review discuss about various methods including its current conventional treatment with special reference to recent advances in delivery systems encapsulating various anticancer drugs and natural plant products for targeting towards cervical cancer. The role of photothermal therapy, gene therapy and radiation therapy against cervical cancer is also discussed. Systemic/targeted drug delivery systems including liposomes, nanoparticles, hydrogels, dendrimers etc. and localized drug delivery systems like cervical patches, films, rings etc. are safer than the conventional chemotherapy which has further been proved by the several drug delivery systems undergoing clinical trials. Novel approaches for the aggressive treatment of cervical cancer will optimistically result in decreased side effects as well as toxicity, frequency of administration of existing drugs, to overcome MDR and to increase the survival rates.

Citing Articles

Electrospun Coaxial Polycaprolactone/Polyvinylpyrrolidone Fibers Containing Cisplatin: A Potential Local Chemotherapy Delivery System for Cervical Cancer Treatment.

Silva-Lopez M, Escobar-Barrios V, Alcantara-Quintana L Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076128 PMC: 11902410. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050637.


Investigating new drugs from marine seaweed metabolites for cervical cancer therapy by molecular dynamic modeling approach.

Islam S, Ahmed S, Mahfuj S, Das G, Tareq M, Almehmadi M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3866.

PMID: 39890793 PMC: 11785738. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82043-0.


Nanotechnology and nanobots unleashed: pioneering a new era in gynecological cancer management - a comprehensive review.

Kumar N, Mangla M Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2025; 95(1):18.

PMID: 39754614 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04747-4.


Novel Drug Delivery Approaches for the Localized Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Saha I, Halder J, Rajwar T, Mahanty R, Pradhan D, Dash P AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 25(4):85.

PMID: 38605158 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02801-1.


Unveiling the multitargeted repurposing potential of taxifolin (dihydroquercetin) in cervical cancer: an extensive MM\GBSA-based screening, and MD simulation study.

Almasoudi H, Hakami M, Alhazmi A, Makkawi M, Alasmari S, Alghamdi Y Med Oncol. 2023; 40(8):218.

PMID: 37394519 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02094-7.


References
1.
Bai J, Liu Y, Jiang X . Multifunctional PEG-GO/CuS nanocomposites for near-infrared chemo-photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2014; 35(22):5805-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.008. View

2.
Kaku M, Mathew A, Rajan B . Impact of socio-economic factors in delayed reporting and late-stage presentation among patients with cervix cancer in a major cancer hospital in South India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009; 9(4):589-94. View

3.
Langer R . Biomaterials in drug delivery and tissue engineering: one laboratory's experience. Acc Chem Res. 2000; 33(2):94-101. DOI: 10.1021/ar9800993. View

4.
Milrot E, Jackman A, Kniazhanski T, Gonen P, Flescher E, Sherman L . Methyl jasmonate reduces the survival of cervical cancer cells and downregulates HPV E6 and E7, and survivin. Cancer Lett. 2011; 319(1):31-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.028. View

5.
You B, Moon H, Han Y, Park W . Gallic acid inhibits the growth of HeLa cervical cancer cells via apoptosis and/or necrosis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48(5):1334-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.02.034. View