» Articles » PMID: 30405661

Development of Wheat With Hypoimmunogenic Gluten Obstructed by the Gene Editing Policy in Europe

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2018 Nov 9
PMID 30405661
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coeliac Disease (CD) is an auto-immune reaction to gluten in 1-2% of the human population. A gluten-free (GF) diet, excluding wheat, barley, and rye, is the only remedy. This diet is difficult to adhere to, partly because wheat gluten is added to many processed products for their viscoelastic properties. In addition, GF products are less healthy and expensive. Wheat products containing only hypoimmunogenic gluten proteins would be a desirable option. Various gluten peptides that trigger CD have been characterized. A single wheat variety contains around hundred gluten genes, producing proteins with varying numbers of epitopes. Gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 can precisely remove or modify the DNA sequences coding for immunogenic peptides. Wheat with hypoimmunogenic gluten thus exemplifies the potential of gene editing for improving crops for human consumption where conventional breeding cannot succeed. We describe here, in relation to breeding hypoimmunogenic wheat varieties, the inconsistencies of applying GM regulation in Europe for gene-edited plants while mutation breeding-derived plants are exempted. We explain that healthy products derived from this new technology may become available in the United States, Canada, Argentina and other countries but not in Europe, because of strict regulation of unintended GM risk at the expense of reduction the existing immunogenicity risks of patients. We argue that regulation of gene-edited plants should be based on scientific evidence. Therefore, we strongly recommend implementing the innovation principle. Responsible Research and Innovation, involving stakeholders including CD patient societies in the development of gene-editing products, will enable progress toward healthy products and encourage public acceptance.

Citing Articles

Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.

Caradus J GM Crops Food. 2023; 14(1):1-41.

PMID: 37690075 PMC: 10761188. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2252947.


Capturing Wheat Phenotypes at the Genome Level.

Hussain B, Akpinar B, Alaux M, Algharib A, Sehgal D, Ali Z Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:851079.

PMID: 35860541 PMC: 9289626. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.851079.


Current Status and Perspectives on the Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Editing System to Develop a Low-Gluten, Non-Transgenic Wheat Variety.

Verma A, Mandal S, Tiwari A, Monachesi C, Catassi G, Srivastava A Foods. 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34681400 PMC: 8534962. DOI: 10.3390/foods10102351.


Applications and Major Achievements of Genome Editing in Vegetable Crops: A Review.

Kim Y, Kang Y, Yang E, Cho M, Schafleitner R, Lee J Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:688980.

PMID: 34178006 PMC: 8231707. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.688980.


Wheat ATIs: Characteristics and Role in Human Disease.

Geisslitz S, Shewry P, Brouns F, America A, Caio G, Daly M Front Nutr. 2021; 8:667370.

PMID: 34124122 PMC: 8192694. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.667370.


References
1.
Horstmann S, Belz M, Heitmann M, Zannini E, Arendt E . Fundamental Study on the Impact of Gluten-Free Starches on the Quality of Gluten-Free Model Breads. Foods. 2017; 5(2). PMC: 5302342. DOI: 10.3390/foods5020030. View

2.
Sprink T, Eriksson D, Schiemann J, Hartung F . Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Rep. 2016; 35(7):1493-506. PMC: 4903111. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2. View

3.
van den Broeck H, Hongbing C, Lacaze X, Dusautoir J, Gilissen L, Smulders M . In search of tetraploid wheat accessions reduced in celiac disease-related gluten epitopes. Mol Biosyst. 2010; 6(11):2206-13. DOI: 10.1039/c0mb00046a. View

4.
Shewry P, Tatham A . Improving wheat to remove coeliac epitopes but retain functionality. J Cereal Sci. 2016; 67:12-21. PMC: 4767027. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.06.005. View

5.
Heap B . Europe should rethink its stance on GM crops. Nature. 2013; 498(7455):409. DOI: 10.1038/498409a. View