» Articles » PMID: 30405487

Bidialectalism and Bilingualism: Exploring the Role of Language Similarity As a Link Between Linguistic Ability and Executive Control

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Nov 9
PMID 30405487
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The notion of bilingual advantages in executive functions (EF) is based on the assumption that the demands posed by cross-language interference serve as EF training. These training effects should be more pronounced the more cross-language interference bilinguals have to overcome when managing their two languages. In the present study, we investigated the proposed link between linguistic and EF performance using the similarity between the two languages spoken since childhood as a proxy for different levels of cross-language interference. We assessed the effect of linearly increasing language dissimilarity on linguistic and EF performance in multiple tasks in four groups of young adults (aged 18-33): German monolinguals ( = 24), bidialectals ( = 25; German and Swiss German dialect), bilinguals speaking two languages of the same Indo-European ancestry ( = 24; e.g., German-English), or bilinguals speaking two languages of different ancestry ( = 24; e.g., German-Turkish). Bayesian linear-mixed effects modeling revealed substantial evidence for a linear effect of language similarity on linguistic accuracy, with better performance for participants with more similar languages and monolinguals. However, we did not obtain evidence for the presence of a similarity effect on EF performance. Furthermore, language experience did not modulate EF performance, even when testing the effect of continuous indicators of bilingualism (e.g., age of acquisition, proficiency, daily foreign language usage). These findings question the theoretical assumption that life-long experience in managing cross-language interference serves as EF training.

Citing Articles

The association of multilingualism with diverse language families and cognition among adults with and without education in India.

Petrosyan S, Strangmann I, Nichols E, Meijer E, Briceno E, Narayanan S Neuropsychology. 2025; 39(3):223-234.

PMID: 40063370 PMC: 11902890. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000988.


Orientation towards the vernacular and style-shifting as language behaviours in speech of first-generation Polish migrant communities speaking Norwegian in Norway.

Malarski K, Castle C, Awedyk W, Wrembel M, Jensen I Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1330494.

PMID: 39205976 PMC: 11351563. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330494.


Moving From Bilingual Traits to States: Understanding Cognition and Language Processing Through Moment-to-Moment Variation.

Salig L, Valdes Kroff J, Slevc L, Novick J Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 2(4):487-512.

PMID: 37214629 PMC: 10158593. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00046.


Problematic smartphone usage, objective smartphone engagement, and executive functions: A latent variable analysis.

Hartanto A, Chua Y, Quek F, Wong J, Ooi W, Majeed N Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(8):2610-2625.

PMID: 37188861 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02707-3.


Does Language Distance Modulate the Contribution of Bilingualism to Cognitive Reserve in Seniors? A Systematic Review.

Carthery-Goulart M, Privitera A, Weekes B Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2023; 38:15333175231167223.

PMID: 37186676 PMC: 10623985. DOI: 10.1177/15333175231167223.


References
1.
Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G . Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(4):859-73. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859. View

2.
Blom E, Kuntay A, Messer M, Verhagen J, Leseman P . The benefits of being bilingual: working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014; 128:105-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.007. View

3.
Luk G, Bialystok E . Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013; 25(5):605-621. PMC: 3780436. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574. View

4.
Morton J, Harper S . What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Dev Sci. 2007; 10(6):719-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00623.x. View

5.
Wiseheart M, Viswanathan M, Bialystok E . Flexibility in task switching by monolinguals and bilinguals. Biling (Camb Engl). 2016; 19(1):141-146. PMC: 4749032. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728914000273. View