» Articles » PMID: 30354291

Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients Who Undergo Placement of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 26
PMID 30354291
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are an important part of therapy for many patients, yet there is little data on population characteristics, complications, or system survival in pediatric patients. Methods A retrospective review of ICD recipients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry was performed from 2010 to 2016. Patient characteristics and complications between pediatric (≤21 years) and adult populations (>21 years) were compared. Variables associated with complications and early device interventions within the pediatric cohort were evaluated using multivariate modeling. Results There were 562 209 total ICD implants, of which 3461 occurred in the pediatric cohort. Among the pediatric patients, 60% of implants were for primary prevention, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy was the most common underlying disease (60%). Over time, there was an increasing trend of both primary and secondary prevention ICD implantations ( P<0.05). Compared with adults, pediatric patients were more likely to have structural heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and channelopathy, and to receive a single-chamber device (all P<0.001). There was no difference in inhospital complications between the adult and pediatric cohorts (2.4% versus 2.6%, P=0.3). However, among the pediatric patients, lower weight, Ebstein anomaly, worse New York Heart Association class, dual chamber, and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator were associated with greater risk of complications. Although reintervention for generator replacement or upgrade was more common in adults, the time to reintervention was shorter in the pediatric cohort. Conclusions We observed an increasing trend in ICD device implantation among pediatric patients. The pediatric cohort had similar inhospital complication rates compared with adults but had a shorter time to reintervention.

Citing Articles

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric patients for primary vs. secondary prevention.

Thuraiaiyah J, Philbert B, Jensen A, Xing L, Joergensen T, Lim C Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39345160 PMC: 11440178. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae245.


Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in paediatric patients: yet another example of healthcare divergence?.

DeWitt E, Janousek J, Etheridge S Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39228363 PMC: 11403278. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae230.


Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in paediatric congenital heart disease patients with epicardial cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Aboyewa O, Laternser C, Popescu A, Murphy N, Shah D, Monge M Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(1):qyae060.

PMID: 39045197 PMC: 11251694. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae060.


Low Risk of Inappropriate Shock Among Pediatric Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Single Center Experience.

Einbinder T, Machtei A, Birk E, Schamroth Pravda N, Frenkel G, Amir G Pediatr Cardiol. 2023; 45(8):1776-1783.

PMID: 37668692 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-023-03280-0.


Epicardial vs. transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children.

Le Bos P, Pontailler M, Maltret A, Kraiche D, Gaudin R, Barbanti C Europace. 2023; 25(3):961-968.

PMID: 36735263 PMC: 10062323. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad015.