Individual Differences and Hemispheric Asymmetries for Language and Spatial Attention

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2018 Oct 20

PMID 30337864

Citations 22

Authors

Louise ORegan

Deborah J Serrien

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Language and spatial processing are cognitive functions that are asymmetrically distributed across both cerebral hemispheres. In the present study, we compare left- and right-handers on word comprehension using a divided visual field paradigm and spatial attention using a landmark task. We investigate hemispheric asymmetries by assessing the participants' behavioral metrics; response accuracy, reaction time and their laterality index. The data showed that right-handers benefitted more from left-hemispheric lateralization for language comprehension and right-hemispheric lateralization for spatial attention than left-handers. Furthermore, left-handers demonstrated a more variable distribution across both hemispheres, supporting a less focal profile of functional brain organization. Taken together, the results underline that handedness distinctively modulates hemispheric processing and behavioral performance during verbal and nonverbal tasks. In particular, typical lateralization is most prevalent for right-handers whereas atypical lateralization is more evident for left-handers. These insights contribute to the understanding of individual variation of brain asymmetries and the mechanisms related to changes in cerebral dominance.

Citing Articles

Workload-dependent hemispheric asymmetries during the emotion-cognition interaction: a close-to-naturalistic fNIRS study.

Lingelbach K, Gado S, Wirzberger M, Vukelic M Front Neuroergon. 2024; 4:1273810.

PMID: 38234490 PMC: 10790862. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1273810.

Hippocampal subfield associations with memory depend on stimulus modality and retrieval mode.

Aumont E, Bussy A, Bedard M, Bezgin G, Therriault J, Savard M Brain Commun. 2023; 5(6):fcad309.

PMID: 38035364 PMC: 10681971. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad309.

Reduced neurite density index in the prefrontal cortex of adults with autism assessed using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging.

Arai T, Kamagata K, Uchida W, Andica C, Takabayashi K, Saito Y Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1110883.

PMID: 37638188 PMC: 10450631. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1110883.

Identifying reproducible resting state networks and functional connectivity alterations following chronic restraint stress in anaesthetized rats.

Dai T, Seewoo B, Hennessy L, Bolland S, Rosenow T, Rodger J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1151525.

PMID: 37284657 PMC: 10239969. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1151525.

With childhood hemispherectomy, one hemisphere can support-but is suboptimal for-word and face recognition.

Granovetter M, Robert S, Ettensohn L, Behrmann M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(44):e2212936119.

PMID: 36282918 PMC: 9636967. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2212936119.

References

Corbetta M, Shulman G . Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011; 34:569-99. PMC: 3790661. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731. View

Boulenger V, Roy A, Paulignan Y, Deprez V, Jeannerod M, Nazir T . Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(10):1607-15. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607. View

Scarisbrick D, Tweedy J, Kuslansky G . Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia. 1987; 25(4):695-9. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90061-3. View

Cavezian C, Valadao D, Hurwitz M, Saoud M, Danckert J . Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance. Brain Res. 2012; 1437:89-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.002. View

Moseley R, Carota F, Hauk O, Mohr B, Pulvermuller F . A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 22(7):1634-47. PMC: 3377965. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr238. View

Price C . The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. J Anat. 2000; 197 Pt 3:335-59. PMC: 1468137. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19730335.x. View

Roberts R, Anderson E, Husain M . Expert cognitive control and individual differences associated with frontal and parietal white matter microstructure. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(50):17063-7. PMC: 3115511. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4879-10.2010. View

Serrien D, Sovijarvi-Spape M . Manual dexterity: Functional lateralisation patterns and motor efficiency. Brain Cogn. 2016; 108:42-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.005. View

Perelle I, Ehrman L . On the other hand. Behav Genet. 2005; 35(3):343-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-005-3226-z. View

10.

Ghirlanda S, Vallortigara G . The evolution of brain lateralization: a game-theoretical analysis of population structure. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1541):853-7. PMC: 1691668. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2669. View

11.

Serrien D, Ivry R, Swinnen S . Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(2):160-6. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1849. View

12.

Szaflarski J, Binder J, Possing E, McKiernan K, Ward B, Hammeke T . Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology. 2002; 59(2):238-44. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.59.2.238. View

13.

Godfrey H, Grimshaw G . Emotional language is all right: Emotional prosody reduces hemispheric asymmetry for linguistic processing. Laterality. 2015; 21(4-6):568-584. DOI: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1096940. View

14.

Zago L, Petit L, Mellet E, Jobard G, Crivello F, Joliot M . The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 93(Pt B):394-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.018. View

15.

Serrien D, Sovijarvi-Spape M . Cognitive control of response inhibition and switching: hemispheric lateralization and hand preference. Brain Cogn. 2013; 82(3):283-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.013. View

16.

Siman-Tov T, Mendelsohn A, Schonberg T, Avidan G, Podlipsky I, Pessoa L . Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(42):11271-8. PMC: 6673032. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-07.2007. View

17.

Brodie E, Pettigrew L . Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia. 1996; 34(5):467-70. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00130-1. View

18.

Suchan J, Rorden C, Karnath H . Neglect severity after left and right brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(6):1136-41. PMC: 3348265. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.018. View

19.

Andresen D, Marsolek C . Does a causal relation exist between the functional hemispheric asymmetries of visual processing subsystems?. Brain Cogn. 2005; 59(2):135-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.010. View

20.

Cherbuin N, Brinkman C . Hemispheric interactions are different in left-handed individuals. Neuropsychology. 2006; 20(6):700-7. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.700. View