» Articles » PMID: 30334791

Improving Spatial Resolution Using Incoherent Subtraction of Receive Beams Having Different Apodizations

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In ultrasonic imaging, reduction of lateral sidelobes can result in an improved image with less distortion and fewer artifacts. In general, apodization is used to lower sidelobes in exchange for increasing the width of the main lobe, and thus decreasing lateral resolution. Null subtraction imaging (NSI) is a nonlinear image processing technique that uses different receive apodizations on copies of the same RF data to maintain low sidelobe levels while simultaneously improving lateral resolution. The images created with three different apodization functions are combined to form an image with low sidelobe levels and apparent improvements in lateral resolution compared to conventional rectangular apodization. To evaluate the performance of this technique for different imaging tasks, experiments were performed on an ATS539 phantom containing wire targets to assess lateral resolution and cylindrical anechoic and hyperechoic targets to assess contrast. NSI images were compared against rectangular apodized images and minimum variance beamformed images. In experiments, the apparent lateral resolution was observed to improve by a factor of more than 35× when compared to rectangular apodization. Image quality was assessed by the estimation of lateral resolution (-6-dB receive beamwidth), main-lobe-to-sidelobe ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Imaging with NSI using a focal number of 2 (f/2), the -6-dB beamwidth on receive as measured from a small wire target in the ATS phantom was 0.03λ compared to 2.79λ for rectangular apodization. Sidelobes were observed to decrease by 32.9 dB with NSI compared to rectangular apodization. However, the ability to observe the contrast of anechoic and hyperechoic targets reduced when utilizing the NSI scheme, i.e., the CNR decreased from -3.05 to -1.01 for anechoic targets and 1.65 to 0.45 for the hyperechoic targets.

Citing Articles

Nonlinear beamforming for intracardiac echocardiography: a comparative study.

Kim H, Cho S, Park E, Park S, Oh D, Lee K Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(3):571-582.

PMID: 38645597 PMC: 11026316. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00352-9.


High-Resolution Power Doppler Using Null Subtraction Imaging.

Kou Z, Lowerison M, You Q, Wang Y, Song P, Oelze M IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2024; 43(9):3060-3071.

PMID: 38557625 PMC: 11439488. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2024.3383768.


Design and Implementation of Analog-Digital Hybrid Beamformers for Low-Complexity Ultrasound Systems: A Feasibility Study.

Yoon H, Kim J, Lee K, Song T Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38275576 PMC: 10813642. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010008.


Detection of microcalcifications using nonlinear beamforming techniques.

Kou Z, Park T, Miller R, Oelze M Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023; 49(8):1709-1718.

PMID: 37127527 PMC: 10293108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.03.011.


Grating Lobe Reduction in Plane-Wave Imaging With Angular Compounding Using Subtraction of Coherent Signals.

Kou Z, Miller R, Oelze M IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022; 69(12):3308-3316.

PMID: 36306299 PMC: 9741941. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3217993.


References
1.
Sung J, Jeong J . Dual-/tri-apodization techniques for high frequency ultrasound imaging: a simulation study. Biomed Eng Online. 2014; 13:143. PMC: 4271436. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-143. View

2.
Machado P, Eisenbrey J, Cavanaugh B, Forsberg F . New image processing technique for evaluating breast microcalcifications: a comparative study. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(6):885-93. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.6.885. View

3.
Guenther D, Walker W . Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part II: simulation results. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007; 54(2):343-58. DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2007.248. View

4.
Insana M, Zagzebski J, Madsen E . Acoustic backscattering from ultrasonically tissuelike media. Med Phys. 1982; 9(6):848-55. DOI: 10.1118/1.595194. View

5.
Synnevag J, Austeng A, Holm S . A low-complexity data-dependent beamformer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011; 58(2):281-9. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1805. View