» Articles » PMID: 30333854

Learning Subject-Specific Directed Acyclic Graphs With Mixed Effects Structural Equation Models From Observational Data

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2018 Oct 19
PMID 30333854
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The identification of causal relationships between random variables from large-scale observational data using directed acyclic graphs (DAG) is highly challenging. We propose a new mixed-effects structural equation model (mSEM) framework to estimate subject-specific DAGs, where we represent joint distribution of random variables in the DAG as a set of structural causal equations with mixed effects. The directed edges between nodes depend on observed exogenous covariates on each of the individual and unobserved latent variables. The strength of the connection is decomposed into a fixed-effect term representing the average causal effect given the covariates and a random effect term representing the latent causal effect due to unobserved pathways. The advantage of such decomposition is to capture essential asymmetric structural information and heterogeneity between DAGs in order to allow for the identification of causal structure with observational data. In addition, by pooling information across subject-specific DAGs, we can identify causal structure with a high probability and estimate subject-specific networks with a high precision. We propose a penalized likelihood-based approach to handle multi-dimensionality of the DAG model. We propose a fast, iterative computational algorithm, DAG-MM, to estimate parameters in mSEM and achieve desirable sparsity by hard-thresholding the edges. We theoretically prove the identifiability of mSEM. Using simulations and an application to protein signaling data, we show substantially improved performances when compared to existing methods and consistent results with a network estimated from interventional data. Lastly, we identify gray matter atrophy networks in regions of brain from patients with Huntington's disease and corroborate our findings using white matter connectivity data collected from an independent study.

Citing Articles

In reference to ''.

Rajkumar A, Ms V J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023; 26(4):222-223.

PMID: 38098357 PMC: 10728680. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.222.

References
1.
Luo R, Zhao H . BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODELING FOR SIGNALING PATHWAY INFERENCE FROM SINGLE CELL INTERVENTIONAL DATA. Ann Appl Stat. 2011; 5(2A):725-745. PMC: 3233205. DOI: 10.1214/10-AOAS425. View

2.
Cheng J, Levina E, Wang P, Zhu J . A sparse Ising model with covariates. Biometrics. 2014; 70(4):943-53. PMC: 4425428. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12202. View

3.
Paulsen J, Long J, Johnson H, Aylward E, Ross C, Williams J . Clinical and Biomarker Changes in Premanifest Huntington Disease Show Trial Feasibility: A Decade of the PREDICT-HD Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014; 6:78. PMC: 4000999. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00078. View

4.
Cai T, Li H, Liu W, Xie J . Covariate-Adjusted Precision Matrix Estimation with an Application in Genetical Genomics. Biometrika. 2017; 100(1):139-156. PMC: 5351557. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass058. View

5.
Meinshausen N, Hauser A, Mooij J, Peters J, Versteeg P, Buhlmann P . Methods for causal inference from gene perturbation experiments and validation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(27):7361-8. PMC: 4941490. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510493113. View