Expression of AR-V7 and ARv in Circulating Tumor Cells Correlates with Outcomes to Taxane Therapy in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated in TAXYNERGY
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Biomarkers aiding treatment optimization in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are scarce. The presence or absence of androgen receptor (AR) splice variants, AR-V7 and AR, in mCRPC patient circulating tumor cells (CTC) may be associated with taxane treatment outcomes. A novel digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay assessed AR-splice variant expression in CTCs from patients receiving docetaxel or cabazitaxel in TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353). Patient outcomes were examined according to AR-splice variant expression, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: Of the 54 evaluable patients, 36 (67%) were AR-V7, 42 (78%) were AR, 29 (54%) were double positive, and 5 (9%) were double negative. PSA response rates at any time were numerically higher for AR-V7 versus AR-V7 (78% vs. 58%; = 0.23) and for AR versus AR (92% vs. 57%; = 0.04) patients. When AR-V mRNA status was correlated with change in nuclear AR from cycle 1 day 1 to day 8 ( = 24), AR-V7 patients ( = 16) had a 0.4% decrease versus a 12.9% and 26.7% decrease in AR-V7/AR ( = 3) and AR-V7/AR ( = 5) patients, respectively, suggesting a dominant role for AR-V7 over AR. Median PFS was 12.02 versus 8.48 months for AR-V7 versus AR-V7 (HR = 0.38; = 0.01), and 12.71 versus 7.29 months for AR versus AR (HR = 0.37; = 0.02). For AR-V7, AR-V7/AR, and AR-V7/AR patients, median PFS was 8.48, 11.17, and 16.62 months, respectively ( = 0.0013 for trend).
Conclusions: Although detection of both CTC-specific AR-V7 and AR by ddPCR influenced taxane outcomes, AR-V7 primarily mediated the prognostic impact. The absence of both variants was associated with the best response and PFS with taxane treatment.See related commentary by Dehm et al., p. 1696.
Castration-resistant prostate cancer monitoring by cell-free circulating biomarkers.
Chrenkova E, Studentova H, Hola K, Kahounova Z, Hendrychova R, Soucek K Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1394292.
PMID: 39319053 PMC: 11420116. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394292.
Alternative splicing in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance.
Rawat C, Heemers H Oncogene. 2024; 43(22):1655-1668.
PMID: 38658776 PMC: 11136669. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-03036-x.
Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers.
Valentin Lopez J, Lange C, Dehm S J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2024; 241:106522.
PMID: 38641298 PMC: 11139604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106522.
How to Integrate Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Urology Clinical Practice: An Update.
Baston C, Preda A, Iordache A, Olaru V, Surcel C, Sinescu I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).
PMID: 38254807 PMC: 10813985. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020316.
Brighi N, Conteduca V, Gurioli G, Scarpi E, Cursano M, Bleve S ESMO Open. 2023; 8(6):102036.
PMID: 37866028 PMC: 10774884. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102036.