» Articles » PMID: 3029898

Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on Hepatic and Uterine Estrogen Receptor Levels in Rats

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Toxicology
Date 1987 Feb 1
PMID 3029898
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Administration of a single dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD, 20 or 80 micrograms/kg) resulted in significantly decreased hepatic and uterine estrogen receptor (ER) levels in 25-day-old female Long-Evans rats. By contrast, estradiol (5 and 15 micrograms/kg) administration increased hepatic and uterine ER levels, while a combination of 2,3,7,8-TCDD plus estradiol resulted in uterine and hepatic ER levels which were similar or lower than those observed after treatment with only 2,3,7,8-TCDD. In addition, 2,3,7,8-TCDD significantly decreased the effects of estradiol on uterine wet weight increase. Competitive binding studies showed that estradiol did not bind to the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor and that 2,3,7,8-TCDD did not bind to the ER. The effects of structure on the activity of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin congeners on their activity to down-regulate hepatic and uterine ER levels were determined by using 2,3,7,8-TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD), 1,3,7,8-TCDD, and 1,2,4,7,8-PeCDD. Both 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD exhibit high affinities for the Ah receptor and at dose levels of 80 micrograms/kg the hepatic ER levels were decreased 42 and 41%, respectively, and uterine ER levels were decreased 53 and 49%, respectively. 1,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,4,7,8-PeCDD bind less avidly to the Ah receptor and at dose levels of 400 micrograms/kg these compounds decreased hepatic ER levels 36 and 40%, respectively, and uterine ER levels 21 and 24%, respectively. These results support a role for the Ah receptor in the down-regulation of uterine and hepatic ER levels in the female rat by 2,3,7,8-TCDD and this effect may be associated with the decrease in spontaneous mammary and uterine tumors observed in female rats treated with 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of action of agrochemicals acting as endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Warner G, Mourikes V, Neff A, Brehm E, Flaws J Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019; 502:110680.

PMID: 31838026 PMC: 6942667. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110680.


Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Endometrial Cancer: An Overview of Recent Laboratory Evidence and Epidemiological Studies.

Mallozzi M, Leone C, Manurita F, Bellati F, Caserta D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(3).

PMID: 28327540 PMC: 5369169. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030334.


Comparisons of differential gene expression elicited by TCDD, PCB126, βNF, or ICZ in mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells and C57BL/6 mouse liver.

Nault R, Forgacs A, Dere E, Zacharewski T Toxicol Lett. 2013; 223(1):52-9.

PMID: 23994337 PMC: 4096832. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.08.013.


Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in carcinogenesis and potential as a drug target.

Safe S, Lee S, Jin U Toxicol Sci. 2013; 135(1):1-16.

PMID: 23771949 PMC: 3748760. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kft128.


Endocrine disruptors and falling sperm counts: lessons learned or not!.

Safe S Asian J Androl. 2012; 15(2):191-4.

PMID: 23001442 PMC: 3739165. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2012.87.