» Articles » PMID: 30281699

Lessons and Perspectives for Applications of Stochastic Models in Biological and Cancer Research

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 4
PMID 30281699
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of randomness, an unavoidable feature of intracellular environments, are observed at higher hierarchical levels of living matter organization, such as cells, tissues, and organisms. Additionally, the many compounds interacting as a well-orchestrated network of reactions increase the difficulties of assessing these systems using only experiments. This limitation indicates that elucidation of the dynamics of biological systems is a complex task that will benefit from the establishment of principles to help describe, categorize, and predict the behavior of these systems. The theoretical machinery already available, or ones to be discovered to help solve biological problems, might play an important role in these processes. Here, we demonstrate the application of theoretical tools by discussing some biological problems that we have approached mathematically: fluctuations in gene expression and cell proliferation in the context of loss of contact inhibition. We discuss the methods that have been employed to provide the reader with a biologically motivated phenomenological perspective of the use of theoretical methods. Finally, we end this review with a discussion of new research perspectives motivated by our results.

References
1.
Carreira S, Goodall J, Denat L, Rodriguez M, Nuciforo P, Hoek K . Mitf regulation of Dia1 controls melanoma proliferation and invasiveness. Genes Dev. 2006; 20(24):3426-39. PMC: 1698449. DOI: 10.1101/gad.406406. View

2.
Ramos A, Innocentini G, Forger F, Hornos J . Symmetry in biology: from genetic code to stochastic gene regulation. IET Syst Biol. 2010; 4(5):311-29. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0058. View

3.
Benzekry S, Lamont C, Beheshti A, Tracz A, Ebos J, Hlatky L . Classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014; 10(8):e1003800. PMC: 4148196. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800. View

4.
Savageau M . Comparison of classical and autogenous systems of regulation in inducible operons. Nature. 1974; 252(5484):546-9. DOI: 10.1038/252546a0. View

5.
Iyer-Biswas S, Hayot F, Jayaprakash C . Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009; 79(3 Pt 1):031911. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031911. View