» Articles » PMID: 30269296

Patch Testing Pearls

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 1
PMID 30269296
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dermatitis is one of the most common illnesses encountered by healthcare providers and the causes are numerous. Contact dermatitis is the form of dermatitis resulting from contact with the environment, and it may be either irritant or allergic in nature. Patch testing has been the gold standard for diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis since its formal description over 100 years ago by Jadassohn. While this diagnostic tool may seem simple to us today, there are numerous potential points for error that the practitioner must keep in mind. Patient selection, technique of patch test placement, allergen selection, patch test reading and interpretation, and patient management all must be considered. To simply apply a given set of test allergens indiscriminately and not be prepared to interpret the results accurately with patient education and management in mind would be a great failure. Conversely, with experience and the proper knowledge base some of the most complex dermatitis questions can be answered.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Analysis of Immunoglobulin E Levels, Allergen-Specific Sensitivities, and Clinical Manifestations in Allergic Dermatological Conditions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.

Zhao J, Liang S, Zhou B, Li M, Li L Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024; 17:499-512.

PMID: 38444403 PMC: 10913895. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S451117.


Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment?.

Kalicinska J, Wisniowska B, Polak S, Spiewak R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(7).

PMID: 37047774 PMC: 10094956. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076801.


Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management.

Li Y, Li L Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021; 61(3):245-281.

PMID: 34264448 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08875-0.


A dog lover's dilemma: Airborne allergic contact dermatitis to tylosin.

Kale A, Gaspari A JAAD Case Rep. 2020; 7:100-102.

PMID: 33364279 PMC: 7750704. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.11.011.


Medical devices in allergy practice.

Popov T, Passalacqua G, Gonzalez-Diaz S, Plavec D, Braido F, Garcia-Abujeta J World Allergy Organ J. 2020; 13(10):100466.

PMID: 33024482 PMC: 7529824. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100466.

References
1.
Egan C, Rallis T, Meadows K, Krueger G . Low-dose oral methotrexate treatment for recalcitrant palmoplantar pompholyx. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999; 40(4):612-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70446-9. View

2.
Katsarma G, Gawkrodger D . Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 41(4):193-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06129.x. View

3.
Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White I . Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 41(5):241-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06154.x. View

4.
Isaksson M, Andersen K, Brandao F, Bruynzeel D, Bruze M, Camarasa J . Patch testing with corticosteroid mixes in Europe. A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042001027.x. View

5.
Jonker M, Bruynzeel D . The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42(6):330-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042006330.x. View