» Articles » PMID: 30267018

The Influence of Acoustic Startle Probes on Fear Learning in Humans

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Sep 30
PMID 30267018
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even though human fear-conditioning involves affective learning as well as expectancy learning, most studies assess only one of the two distinct processes. Commonly used read-outs of associative fear learning are the fear-potentiated startle reflex (FPS), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings. FPS is thought to reflect the affective aspect of fear learning, while pupil dilation reflects a general arousal response. However, in order to measure FPS, aversively loud acoustic probes are presented during conditioning, which might in itself exert an effect on fear learning. Here we tested the effect of startle probes on fear learning by comparing brain activation (fMRI), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings with and without acoustic startle probes within subjects. Regardless of startle probes, fear conditioning resulted in enhanced dACC, insula and ventral striatum activation. Interaction analyses showed that startle probes diminished differential pupil dilation between CS+ and CS- due to increased pupil responses to CS-. A trend significant interaction effect was observed for US-expectancy and amygdala activation. Startle probes affect differential fear learning by impeding safety learning, as measured with pupil dilation, a read-out of the cognitive component of fear learning. However, we observed no significant effect of acoustic startle probes on other measures of fear learning.

Citing Articles

Persistent defensive reactivity during extensive avoidance training as a potential mechanism for the perpetuation of safety behaviors.

Franke J, Melzig C, Benke C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25925.

PMID: 39472472 PMC: 11522625. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76175-6.


Attenuating human fear memory retention with minocycline: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Xia Y, Wehrli J, Abivardi A, Hostiuc M, Kleim B, Bach D Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):28.

PMID: 38233395 PMC: 10794420. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02732-2.


Fear-Conditioning to Unpredictable Threats Reveals Sex and Strain Differences in Rat Fear-Potentiated Startle (FPS).

Olivera-Pasilio V, Dabrowska J Neuroscience. 2023; 530:108-132.

PMID: 37640137 PMC: 10726736. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.08.030.


Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation.

Xia Y, Wehrli J, Gerster S, Kroes M, Houtekamer M, Bach D Learn Mem. 2023; 30(7):139-150.

PMID: 37553180 PMC: 10519410. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053781.123.


Fear-conditioning to unpredictable threats reveals sex differences in rat fear-potentiated startle (FPS).

Olivera-Pasilio V, Dabrowska J bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36945466 PMC: 10028867. DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.06.531430.


References
1.
Smith S, Nichols T . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(1):83-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061. View

2.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8. View

3.
Bradley M, Miccoli L, Escrig M, Lang P . The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(4):602-7. PMC: 3612940. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x. View

4.
Soeter M, Kindt M . Dissociating response systems: erasing fear from memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010; 94(1):30-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.03.004. View

5.
van Well S, Visser R, Scholte H, Kindt M . Neural substrates of individual differences in human fear learning: evidence from concurrent fMRI, fear-potentiated startle, and US-expectancy data. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012; 12(3):499-512. PMC: 3400034. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0089-7. View