» Articles » PMID: 26138504

Connectivity-based Segmentation of the Periaqueductal Gray Matter in Human with Brainstem Optimized Diffusion MRI

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Jul 4
PMID 26138504
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) is a midbrain structure, involved in key homeostatic neurobiological functions, such as pain modulation and cardiorespiratory control. Animal research has identified four subdivisional columns that differ in both connectivity and function. Until now these findings have not been replicated in humans. This study used high-resolution brainstem optimized diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and probabilistic tractography to segment the human PAG into four subdivisions, based on voxel connectivity profiles. We identified four distinct subdivisions demonstrating high spatial concordance with the columns of the animal model. The resolution of these subdivisions for individual subjects permitted detailed examination of their structural connectivity without the requirement of an a priori starting location. Interestingly patterns of forebrain connectivity appear to be different to those found in nonhuman studies, whereas midbrain and hindbrain connectivity appears to be maintained. Although there are similarities in the columnar structure of the PAG subdivisions between humans and nonhuman animals, there appears to be different patterns of cortical connectivity. This suggests that the functional organization of the PAG may be different between species, and as a consequence, functional studies in nonhumans may not be directly translatable to humans. This highlights the need for focused functional studies in humans.

Citing Articles

Functional representation of trigeminal nociceptive input in the human periaqueductal gray.

Mehnert J, Tinnermann A, Basedau H, May A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(12):eadj8213.

PMID: 38507498 PMC: 10954197. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj8213.


A structural connectivity atlas of limbic brainstem nuclei.

Levinson S, Miller M, Iftekhar A, Justo M, Arriola D, Wei W Front Neuroimaging. 2023; 1:1009399.

PMID: 37555163 PMC: 10406319. DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.1009399.


Intrinsic brain connectivity alterations despite intact pain inhibition in subjects with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

Huynh V, Lutolf R, Rosner J, Luechinger R, Curt A, Kollias S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11943.

PMID: 37488130 PMC: 10366123. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37783-w.


Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain.

Murty D, Song S, Surampudi S, Pessoa L J Neurosci. 2023; 43(16):2973-2987.

PMID: 36927571 PMC: 10124955. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023.


Electrophysiology as a Tool to Decipher the Network Mechanism of Visceral Pain in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Alam M, Chen J Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832115 PMC: 9955347. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040627.


References
1.
Parry D, Macmillan F, Koutsikou S, McMullan S, Lumb B . Separation of A- versus C-nociceptive inputs into spinal-brainstem circuits. Neuroscience. 2008; 152(4):1076-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.018. View

2.
Keay K, Bandler R . Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002; 25(7-8):669-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00049-5. View

3.
Newman D, Hilleary S, Ginsberg C . Nuclear terminations of corticoreticular fiber systems in rats. Brain Behav Evol. 1989; 34(4):223-64. DOI: 10.1159/000116508. View

4.
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8. View

5.
Semendeferi K, Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Zilles K, Van Hoesen G . Prefrontal cortex in humans and apes: a comparative study of area 10. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001; 114(3):224-41. DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<224::AID-AJPA1022>3.0.CO;2-I. View