» Articles » PMID: 30266101

Genomes from Uncultivated Prokaryotes: a Comparison of Metagenome-assembled and Single-amplified Genomes

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2018 Sep 30
PMID 30266101
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prokaryotes dominate the biosphere and regulate biogeochemical processes essential to all life. Yet, our knowledge about their biology is for the most part limited to the minority that has been successfully cultured. Molecular techniques now allow for obtaining genome sequences of uncultivated prokaryotic taxa, facilitating in-depth analyses that may ultimately improve our understanding of these key organisms.

Results: We compared results from two culture-independent strategies for recovering bacterial genomes: single-amplified genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes. Single-amplified genomes were obtained from samples collected at an offshore station in the Baltic Sea Proper and compared to previously obtained metagenome-assembled genomes from a time series at the same station. Among 16 single-amplified genomes analyzed, seven were found to match metagenome-assembled genomes, affiliated with a diverse set of taxa. Notably, genome pairs between the two approaches were nearly identical (average 99.51% sequence identity; range 98.77-99.84%) across overlapping regions (30-80% of each genome). Within matching pairs, the single-amplified genomes were consistently smaller and less complete, whereas the genetic functional profiles were maintained. For the metagenome-assembled genomes, only on average 3.6% of the bases were estimated to be missing from the genomes due to wrongly binned contigs.

Conclusions: The strong agreement between the single-amplified and metagenome-assembled genomes emphasizes that both methods generate accurate genome information from uncultivated bacteria. Importantly, this implies that the research questions and the available resources are allowed to determine the selection of genomics approach for microbiome studies.

Citing Articles

dna2bit: high performance genomic distance estimation software for microbial genome analysis.

Li J, Tian Y, Wang Y, Jin L Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1521181.

PMID: 39764445 PMC: 11701053. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1521181.


Microbial communities associated with marine sponges from diverse geographic locations harbor biosynthetic novelty.

Nowak V, Hou P, Owen J Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(12):e0072624.

PMID: 39565113 PMC: 11653728. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00726-24.


Biodiversity of microorganisms in the Baltic Sea: the power of novel methods in the identification of marine microbes.

Mazur-Marzec H, Andersson A, Blaszczyk A, Dabek P, Gorecka E, Grabski M FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2024; 48(5).

PMID: 39366767 PMC: 11500664. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuae024.


Metabolic activities of marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea orchestrated by quorum sensing.

Pereira O, Qin W, Galand P, Debroas D, Lami R, Hochart C mLife. 2024; 3(3):417-429.

PMID: 39359677 PMC: 11442133. DOI: 10.1002/mlf2.12144.


The oral-gut microbiome axis in health and disease.

Kunath B, De Rudder C, Laczny C, Letellier E, Wilmes P Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024; 22(12):791-805.

PMID: 39039286 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-024-01075-5.


References
1.
Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glockner F . SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(14):1823-9. PMC: 3389763. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. View

2.
Imelfort M, Parks D, Woodcroft B, Dennis P, Hugenholtz P, Tyson G . GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e603. PMC: 4183954. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.603. View

3.
Darling A, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen 4th F, Bik H, Eisen J . PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e243. PMC: 3897386. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.243. View

4.
Reddy T, Thomas A, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Isbandi M, Jansson J . The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D1099-106. PMC: 4384021. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku950. View

5.
Mason O, Hazen T, Borglin S, Chain P, Dubinsky E, Fortney J . Metagenome, metatranscriptome and single-cell sequencing reveal microbial response to Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ISME J. 2012; 6(9):1715-27. PMC: 3498917. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.59. View