» Articles » PMID: 30266093

Clinical Exome Sequencing for Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities and a Suspected Mendelian Disorder

Abstract

Background: Exome sequencing is now being incorporated into clinical care for pediatric and adult populations, but its integration into prenatal diagnosis has been more limited. One reason for this is the paucity of information about the clinical utility of exome sequencing in the prenatal setting.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed indications, results, time to results (turnaround time, TAT), and impact of exome results for 146 consecutive "fetal exomes" performed in a clinical diagnostic laboratory between March 2012 and November 2017. We define a fetal exome as one performed on a sample obtained from a fetus or a product of conception with at least one structural anomaly detected by prenatal imaging or autopsy. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact test.

Results: Prenatal exome yielded an overall molecular diagnostic rate of 32% (n = 46/146). Of the 46 molecular diagnoses, 50% were autosomal dominant disorders (n = 23/46), 41% were autosomal recessive disorders (n = 19/46), and 9% were X-linked disorders (n = 4/46). The molecular diagnostic rate was highest for fetuses with anomalies affecting multiple organ systems and for fetuses with craniofacial anomalies. Out of 146 cases, a prenatal trio exome option designed for ongoing pregnancies was performed on 62 fetal specimens, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 35% with an average TAT of 14 days for initial reporting (excluding tissue culture time). The molecular diagnoses led to refined recurrence risk estimates, altered medical management, and informed reproductive planning for families.

Conclusion: Exome sequencing is a useful diagnostic tool when fetal structural anomalies suggest a genetic etiology, but other standard prenatal genetic tests did not provide a diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Fetal genetic factors in pregnancy loss: Insights from a meta-analysis and effectiveness of whole exome sequencing.

Hadjipanteli A, Theodosiou A, Papaevripidou I, Alexandrou A, Salameh N, Evangelidou P PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319052.

PMID: 39999070 PMC: 11856309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319052.


Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray to examine the genetic factors associated with fetal aberrant right subclavian artery.

Wu W, Zhang F, Li Y, Li P, Liu M, Wang F Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39899060 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07946-3.


Novel Intragenic and Genomic Variants Highlight the Phenotypic Variability in -Related Disease.

Reis L, Basel D, Bitoun P, Walton D, Glaser T, Semina E Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766903 PMC: 11675438. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121636.


Implementation of a national rapid prenatal exome sequencing service in England: evaluation of service outcomes and factors associated with regional variation.

Ramakrishnan R, Mallinson C, Hardy S, Broughan J, Blyth M, Melis G Front Genet. 2024; 15:1485306.

PMID: 39568676 PMC: 11576421. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1485306.


Non-invasive prenatal detection of dominant single-gene disorders in fetal structural abnormalities: a clinical feasibility study.

Wang L, Wu X, Mou J, Ren L, Wu B, Xiang G Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(6):2943-2955.

PMID: 39549115 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07800-y.


References
1.
Breman A, Pursley A, Hixson P, Bi W, Ward P, Bacino C . Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(4):351-61. DOI: 10.1002/pd.3861. View

2.
Kalia S, Adelman K, Bale S, Chung W, Eng C, Evans J . Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2016; 19(2):249-255. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. View

3.
Shamseldin H, Kurdi W, Almusafri F, Alnemer M, Alkaff A, Babay Z . Molecular autopsy in maternal-fetal medicine. Genet Med. 2017; 20(4):420-427. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.111. View

4.
Best S, Wou K, Vora N, Van der Veyver I, Wapner R, Chitty L . Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2017; 38(1):10-19. PMC: 5745303. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5102. View

5.
Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, Magoulas P, Ghazi A, Vetrini F . Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171(12):e173438. PMC: 6359927. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438. View