» Articles » PMID: 30257892

Cosmetic Consequences of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer: Something Worth Talking About

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Sep 28
PMID 30257892
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for breast cancer can lead to deformation of the treated breast, resulting in patient dissatisfaction with the final cosmetic outcome. Currently, literature on the specific information needs of patients concerning the cosmetic effects of BCT is lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate the information needs of breast cancer patients regarding the long-term cosmetic outcome after BCT.

Subjects, Materials, And Methods: The data from 115 women who had undergone BCT in a general teaching hospital breast cancer unit in The Netherlands were studied. Structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2012 and April 2013. A mixed model of quantitative and qualitative research was used to explore patient-reported information needs. A phenomenological approach was used to analyze the qualitative data.

Results: This study shows that women undergoing BCT want to discuss long-term cosmetic effects. Most patients appreciate such information immediately after the diagnosis. Patients indicated that it is also important to pay attention to the cosmetic effects during the follow-up visits, because deformation of the breast can also occur at a later stage. Furthermore, half the patients indicated that they would not likely raise the subject of cosmetic effects of the treatment themselves.

Conclusion: Breast cancer patients have a need for long-term attention for cosmetic outcome of BCT, which should be tailored during the treatment and follow-up process.

Implications For Practice: Currently, no literature exists concerning patients' needs for information regarding the cosmetic effects of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Bringing up the cosmetic effects of BCT by health care professionals does not appear to be a standard part of treatment and follow-up. It is expected that the quality of care and life will be improved by providing information and guidance regarding the cosmetic outcome of BCT within the existing structure of the breast cancer pathway. Discussion and visualization of the cosmetic effects prior to treatment will lead to more realistic expectations, and as a result, secondary interventions, such as partial prostheses and plastic surgery, may be easier to discuss and accept.

Citing Articles

Secondary Resections and Survival After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Cancer Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Ovchinnikov M, Kluttig A, Burger E, Thies S, Lacruz M, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941738 PMC: 11815734. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030369.


Characterizing informational needs and information seeking behavior of patients with breast cancer.

Ludwigson A, Huynh V, Vemuru S, Romandetti K, Fisher C, Coons H Am J Surg. 2023; 227:100-105.

PMID: 37863795 PMC: 11376347. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.047.


Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter....

Nozaki M, Kagami Y, Takahashi M, Machida R, Sekino Y, Shibata T Breast Cancer. 2022; 29(6):1042-1049.

PMID: 35861936 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01384-8.


Talking about breast symmetry in the breast cancer clinic: What can we learn from an examination of clinical interaction?.

Mace S, Collins S, Speer S Health Expect. 2021; 24(2):209-221.

PMID: 33517586 PMC: 8077149. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13144.


Cosmetic Consequences of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer: Something Worth Talking About.

Brands-Appeldoorn A, Maaskant-Braat S, Schenk K, Roumen R Oncologist. 2018; 24(2):172-177.

PMID: 30257892 PMC: 6369959. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0443.

References
1.
Beadle G, Come S, Henderson I, Silver B, Hellman S, Harris J . The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the cosmetic results after primary radiation treatment for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984; 10(11):2131-7. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90213-x. View

2.
Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad W, Horiot J, Jager J . The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol. 2000; 55(3):219-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00210-3. View

3.
Ciammella P, Podgornii A, Galeandro M, Micera R, Ramundo D, Palmieri T . Toxicity and cosmetic outcome of hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy: predictive clinical and dosimetric factors. Radiat Oncol. 2014; 9:97. PMC: 4029983. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-97. View

4.
Waljee J, Hu E, Ubel P, Smith D, Newman L, Alderman A . Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(20):3331-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375. View

5.
Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, Yarnold J, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G . Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. Radiother Oncol. 1992; 25(3):153-9. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90261-r. View