» Articles » PMID: 30257078

Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes

Abstract

This revision of the classification of eukaryotes follows that of Adl et al., 2012 [J. Euk. Microbiol. 59(5)] and retains an emphasis on protists. Changes since have improved the resolution of many nodes in phylogenetic analyses. For some clades even families are being clearly resolved. As we had predicted, environmental sampling in the intervening years has massively increased the genetic information at hand. Consequently, we have discovered novel clades, exciting new genera and uncovered a massive species level diversity beyond the morphological species descriptions. Several clades known from environmental samples only have now found their home. Sampling soils, deeper marine waters and the deep sea will continue to fill us with surprises. The main changes in this revision are the confirmation that eukaryotes form at least two domains, the loss of monophyly in the Excavata, robust support for the Haptista and Cryptista. We provide suggested primer sets for DNA sequences from environmental samples that are effective for each clade. We have provided a guide to trophic functional guilds in an appendix, to facilitate the interpretation of environmental samples, and a standardized taxonomic guide for East Asian users.

Citing Articles

Internal transcribed spacers enable species-level Metataxonomic analysis of ciliated protozoa.

Somasundaram S, Yu Z ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycaf024.

PMID: 40041701 PMC: 11879186. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf024.


Free-living amoebae: a journey into historical aspects and to current discoveries.

Santos H Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2025; 120:e240246.

PMID: 40008701 PMC: 11852317. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760240246.


Re-Analyses of Samples From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients and Controls Identify Many Novel Small RNAs With Diagnostic And Prognostic Potential.

Loher P, Londin E, Ilieva H, Pasinelli P, Rigoutsos I Mol Neurobiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39982687 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-025-04747-2.


R-loops acted on by RNase H1 influence DNA replication timing and genome stability in Leishmania.

Damasceno J, Briggs E, Krasilnikova M, Marques C, Lapsley C, McCulloch R Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1470.

PMID: 39922816 PMC: 11807225. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56785-y.


Re-evaluating evidence for giant genomes in amoebae.

Barzilay D, Alcino J, Ribeiro G, Sousa A, Lahr D Genet Mol Biol. 2025; 47Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e20240092.

PMID: 39873136 PMC: 11773323. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2024-0092.


References
1.
Lopez-Escardo D, Lopez-Garcia P, Moreira D, Ruiz-Trillo I, Torruella G . Parvularia atlantis gen. et sp. nov., a Nucleariid Filose Amoeba (Holomycota, Opisthokonta). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2017; 65(2):170-179. PMC: 5708529. DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12450. View

2.
Lara E, Heger T, Ekelund F, Lamentowicz M, Mitchell E . Ribosomal RNA genes challenge the monophyly of the Hyalospheniidae (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida). Protist. 2007; 159(2):165-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2007.09.003. View

3.
Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, Putnam N, Hellsten U, Kawashima T . The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature. 2008; 454(7207):955-60. DOI: 10.1038/nature07191. View

4.
Tekle Y, Wood F . Longamoebia is not monophyletic: Phylogenomic and cytoskeleton analyses provide novel and well-resolved relationships of amoebozoan subclades. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017; 114:249-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.06.019. View

5.
Lahr D, Grant J, Nguyen T, Lin J, Katz L . Comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of amoebozoa based on concatenated analyses of SSU-rDNA and actin genes. PLoS One. 2011; 6(7):e22780. PMC: 3145751. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022780. View