» Articles » PMID: 30233262

Metacognitive Approaches to the Treatment of Psychosis: a Comparison of Four Approaches

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2018 Sep 21
PMID 30233262
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In light of increasing interest in metacognition and its role in recovery from psychosis, a range of new treatments focused on addressing metacognitive deficits have emerged. These include Metacognitive Therapy, Metacognitive Training, metacognitive insight and reflection therapy, and metacognitive interpersonal therapy for psychosis. While each of these treatments uses the term metacognitive, each differs in terms of their epistemological underpinnings, their structure, format, presumed mechanisms of action, and primary outcomes. To clarify how these treatments converge and diverge, we first offer a brief history of metacognition as well as its potential role in an individual's response to and recovery from complicated mental health conditions including psychosis. We then review the background, practices, and supporting evidence for each treatment. Finally, we will offer a framework for thinking about how each of these approaches may ultimately complement rather than contradict one another and highlight areas for development. We suggest first that each is concerned with something beyond what people with psychosis think about themselves and their lives. Each of these four approaches is interested in how patients with severe mental illness think about themselves. Each looks at immediate reactions and ideas that frame the meaning of thoughts. Second, each of these approaches is more concerned with why people make dysfunctional decisions and take maladaptive actions rather than what comprised those decisions and actions. Third, despite their differences, each of these treatments is true to the larger construct of metacognition and is focused on person's relationships to their mental experiences, promoting various forms of self-understanding which allow for better self-management. Each can be distinguished from other cognitive and skills-based approaches to the treatment of psychosis in their emphasis on sense-making rather than learning a new specific thing to say, think, or do in a given situation.

Citing Articles

Subjective Experience and Perceived Benefits in Clients with Schizophrenia Following Participation in Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT).

Tsuck-Ram N, Moka A, Lavi-Rotenberg A, Igra L, Hasson-Ohayon I Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38920781 PMC: 11200425. DOI: 10.3390/bs14060450.


An observational treatment study of metacognition in anxious-depression.

Fox C, Lee C, Hanlon A, Seow T, Lynch K, Harty S Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37818942 PMC: 10567110. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87193.


Targeting metacognitive change mechanisms in acute inpatients with psychotic symptoms: feasibility and acceptability of a modularized group intervention.

Gussmann E, Lindner C, Lucae S, Falkai P, Padberg F, Egli S Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023; 274(4):963-979.

PMID: 37741946 PMC: 11127867. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-023-01690-y.


Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos' dilemma-on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis.

Brocker A, von Haebler D, Lempa G, Montag C Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1229113.

PMID: 37529074 PMC: 10389263. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229113.


Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach.

Gussmann E, Lucae S, Falkai P, Padberg F, Egli S, Kopf-Beck J Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1160075.

PMID: 37324820 PMC: 10267344. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160075.


References
1.
Fisher P, Wells A . Metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case series. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007; 39(2):117-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.12.001. View

2.
Morrison A, Wells A, Nothard S . Cognitive factors in predisposition to auditory and visual hallucinations. Br J Clin Psychol. 2000; 39(1):67-78. DOI: 10.1348/014466500163112. View

3.
Lysaker P, Carcione A, Dimaggio G, Johannesen J, Nicolo G, Procacci M . Metacognition amidst narratives of self and illness in schizophrenia: associations with neurocognition, symptoms, insight and quality of life. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005; 112(1):64-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00514.x. View

4.
van Donkersgoed R, de Jong S, Pijnenborg G . Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) with a Patient with Persistent Negative Symptoms. J Contemp Psychother. 2016; 46(4):245-253. PMC: 5061837. DOI: 10.1007/s10879-016-9333-8. View

5.
Schilling L, Moritz S, Kother U, Nagel M . Preliminary Results on Acceptance, Feasibility, and Subjective Efficacy of the Add-On Group Intervention Metacognitive Training for Borderline Patients. J Cogn Psychother. 2020; 29(2):153-164. DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.29.2.153. View