» Articles » PMID: 30230993

Single-cell Responses to Three-dimensional Structure in a Functionally Defined Patch in Macaque Area TEO

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2018 Sep 20
PMID 30230993
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both dorsal and ventral visual pathways harbor several areas sensitive to gradients of binocular disparity (i.e., higher-order disparity). Although a wealth of information exists about disparity processing in early visual (V1, V2, and V3) and end-stage areas, TE in the ventral stream, and the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) in the dorsal stream, little is known about midlevel area TEO in the ventral pathway. We recorded single-unit responses to disparity-defined curved stimuli in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation elicited by curved surfaces compared with flat surfaces in the macaque area TEO. This fMRI activation contained a small proportion of disparity-selective neurons, with very few of them second-order disparity selective. Overall, this population of TEO neurons did not preserve its three-dimensional structure selectivity across positions in depth, indicating a lack of higher-order disparity selectivity, but showed stronger responses to flat surfaces than to curved surfaces, as predicted by the fMRI experiment. The receptive fields of the responsive TEO cells were relatively small and generally foveal. A linear support vector machine classifier showed that this population of disparity-selective TEO neurons contains reliable information about the sign of curvature and the position in depth of the stimulus. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We recorded in a part of the macaque area TEO that is activated more by curved surfaces than by flat surfaces at different disparities using the same stimuli. In contrast to previous studies, this functional magnetic resonance imaging-defined patch did not contain a large number of higher-order disparity-selective neurons. However, a linear support vector machine could reliably classify both the sign of the disparity gradient and the position in depth of the stimuli.

Citing Articles

Two Disparity Channels in Human Visual Cortex With Different Contrast and Blur Sensitivity.

Kaestner M, Chen Y, Clement C, Hodges A, Norcia A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(2):21.

PMID: 38411970 PMC: 10910559. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.2.21.


The current status and trend of the functional magnetic resonance combined with stimulation in animals.

Huang J, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Wei L, Zhang X, Jin C Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:963175.

PMID: 36213733 PMC: 9540855. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.963175.


Disparity in Context: Understanding how monocular image content interacts with disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Duan Y, Thatte J, Yaklovleva A, Norcia A Neuroimage. 2021; 237:118139.

PMID: 33964460 PMC: 10786599. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118139.


The visual prefrontal cortex of anthropoids: interaction with temporal cortex in decision making and its role in the making of "visual animals".

Eldridge M, Hines B, Murray E Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021; 41:22-29.

PMID: 33796638 PMC: 8009333. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.012.


Early Emergence of Solid Shape Coding in Natural and Deep Network Vision.

Srinath R, Emonds A, Wang Q, Lempel A, Dunn-Weiss E, Connor C Curr Biol. 2020; 31(1):51-65.e5.

PMID: 33096039 PMC: 7856003. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.076.


References
1.
Hegde J, Van Essen D . Role of primate visual area V4 in the processing of 3-D shape characteristics defined by disparity. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(4):2856-66. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00802.2004. View

2.
Popivanov I, Jastorff J, Vanduffel W, Vogels R . Stimulus representations in body-selective regions of the macaque cortex assessed with event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(2):723-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.013. View

3.
Uka T, Tanaka H, Yoshiyama K, Kato M, Fujita I . Disparity selectivity of neurons in monkey inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(1):120-32. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.120. View

4.
Van Dromme I, Vanduffel W, Janssen P . The relation between functional magnetic resonance imaging activations and single-cell selectivity in the macaque intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage. 2015; 113:86-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.023. View

5.
Webster M, Bachevalier J, Ungerleider L . Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb Cortex. 1994; 4(5):470-83. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/4.5.470. View