» Articles » PMID: 36213733

The Current Status and Trend of the Functional Magnetic Resonance Combined with Stimulation in Animals

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 Oct 10
PMID 36213733
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a non-radiative, non-invasive imaging technique, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has excellent effects on studying the activation of blood oxygen levels and functional connectivity of the brain in human and animal models. Compared with resting-state fMRI, fMRI combined with stimulation could be used to assess the activation of specific brain regions and the connectivity of specific pathways and achieve better signal capture with a clear purpose and more significant results. Various fMRI methods and specific stimulation paradigms have been proposed to investigate brain activation in a specific state, such as electrical, mechanical, visual, olfactory, and direct brain stimulation. In this review, the studies on animal brain activation using fMRI combined with different stimulation methods were retrieved. The instruments, experimental parameters, anesthesia, and animal models in different stimulation conditions were summarized. The findings would provide a reference for studies on estimating specific brain activation using fMRI combined with stimulation.

Citing Articles

The mechanism of action of neuromodulation in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Krhut J, Kobbero H, Kanaan R, Fode M, Poulsen M, Zvara P Nat Rev Urol. 2024; .

PMID: 39653756 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00967-8.


The impact of isoflurane anesthesia on brain metabolism in mice: An MRI and electroencephalography study.

Wei Z, Roh S, Yang X, Wang W, Wang J, Chen L NMR Biomed. 2024; 37(12):e5260.

PMID: 39254055 PMC: 11563868. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5260.


Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound elastography in the context of preclinical pharmacological research: significance for the 3R principles.

Obrecht M, Zurbruegg S, Accart N, Lambert C, Doelemeyer A, Ledermann B Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1177421.

PMID: 37448960 PMC: 10337591. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1177421.

References
1.
Premereur E, Janssen P . Effective Connectivity Reveals an Interconnected Inferotemporal Network for Three-Dimensional Structure Processing. J Neurosci. 2020; 40(44):8501-8512. PMC: 7605415. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3024-19.2020. View

2.
B Ekstrom L, Roelfsema P, Arsenault J, Bonmassar G, Vanduffel W . Bottom-up dependent gating of frontal signals in early visual cortex. Science. 2008; 321(5887):414-7. PMC: 3011100. DOI: 10.1126/science.1153276. View

3.
Zhang N, Gore J, Chen L, Avison M . Dependence of BOLD signal change on tactile stimulus intensity in SI of primates. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(6):784-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.05.002. View

4.
Lau C, Zhang J, Xing K, Zhou I, Cheung M, Chan K . BOLD responses in the superior colliculus and lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat viewing an apparent motion stimulus. Neuroimage. 2011; 58(3):878-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.055. View

5.
Ferezou I, Deneux T . Review: How do spontaneous and sensory-evoked activities interact?. Neurophotonics. 2017; 4(3):031221. PMC: 5469390. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.3.031221. View