» Articles » PMID: 30220766

Stigma-Based Bullying Interventions: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Dev Rev
Date 2018 Sep 18
PMID 30220766
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Youth living with socially devalued characteristics (e.g., minority sexual orientation, race, and/or ethnicity; disability; obesity) experience frequent bullying. This stigma-based bullying undermines youths' wellbeing and academic achievement, with lifelong consequences. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommends developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based interventions to address stigma-based bullying. To characterize the existing landscape of these interventions, we conducted a systematic review of stigma-based bullying interventions targeting youth in any country published in the peer-reviewed literature between 2000 and 2015. Our analysis was guided by a theoretical framework of stigma-based bullying, which describes stigma-related factors at the societal, structural, interpersonal, and individual levels that lead to stigma-based bullying. We screened 8,240 articles and identified 22 research studies describing 21 interventions addressing stigma-based bullying. We found that stigma-based bullying interventions are becoming more numerous, yet are unevenly distributed across stigmas, geographic locations, and types of organizations. We further found that these interventions vary in the extent to which they incorporate theory and have been evaluated with a wide range of research designs and types of data. We recommend that future work address stigma-based bullying within multicomponent interventions, adopt interdisciplinary and theory-based approaches, and include rigorous and systematic evaluations. Intervening specifically on stigma-related factors is essential to end stigma-based bullying and improve the wellbeing of youth living with socially devalued characteristics.

Citing Articles

Similarities and Differences Between Bullying and Sexual Harassment in Schools: A Social-Ecological Review of Risk and Protective Factors.

Sahin-Ilkorkor Z, Brubaker S Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851865 PMC: 11762843. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010061.


Predictors of Social Exclusion among Adolescents: The Weight of Physical Self-Concept Dimensions.

Gonzalez-Delgado R, Rodriguez-Hidalgo A, Ortega-Ruiz R, Benitez-Sillero J, Murillo-Morano J Children (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39457200 PMC: 11505718. DOI: 10.3390/children11101235.


Bullying Involvement and Subtypes of Disabilities: Who is Likely to be Affected by What?.

Hong J, Lee J, Rose C, Marsack Topolewski C, Daniels D, Grmusa A J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; .

PMID: 39278896 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06547-4.


The Developmental Collision Hypothesis: An Empirical Test With Three Generations of Sexual Minority Youth.

Bishop M, Fish J, Russell S J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 54(3):559-573.

PMID: 39269587 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02075-7.


Homophobic Bullying, Traditional Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Adolescents According to Their Sexual Orientation.

Hurtado-Mellado A, Rodriguez-Hidalgo A Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199125 PMC: 11351145. DOI: 10.3390/bs14080729.


References
1.
Cole E . Intersectionality and research in psychology. Am Psychol. 2009; 64(3):170-80. DOI: 10.1037/a0014564. View

2.
Dovidio J, Penner L, Albrecht T, Norton W, Gaertner S, Shelton J . Disparities and distrust: the implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(3):478-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.019. View

3.
Poteat V, DiGiovanni C . When biased language use is associated with bullying and dominance behavior: the moderating effect of prejudice. J Youth Adolesc. 2010; 39(10):1123-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-010-9565-y. View

4.
Hatzenbuehler M, Duncan D, Johnson R . Neighborhood-Level LGBT Hate Crimes and Bullying Among Sexual Minority Youths: A Geospatial Analysis. Violence Vict. 2015; 30(4):663-75. DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00166. View

5.
Cottrell C, Neuberg S . Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice". J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 88(5):770-89. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770. View