» Articles » PMID: 30210981

Complications of Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2018 Sep 14
PMID 30210981
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is considered the primary vascularized flap for reconstruction of dural defects with endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. However, the complications and morbidities associated with this reconstructive flap are poorly understood. This article presents a systematic review of the complications and morbidities related to the use of the NSF in skull base surgery.  A systematic review of the literature based on published guidelines was performed to identify potential complications and morbidities related to the NSF. The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 1950 to February 5, 2018.  Twenty-seven articles were identified. Reported complications were as follows: NSF necrosis (4 studies; [0-1.3%]), mucocele formation (5 studies; [0-3.6%]), septal perforation (6 studies, [0-14.4%]), nasal dorsum collapse (2 studies, [0.7-5.8%]), effects on quality of life (QoL) (8 studies), and olfactory loss (11 studies).  Although complications associated with the NSF may be underreported in the literature, the NSF appears to be a safe and reliable reconstructive flap in EES of the skull base.

Citing Articles

Nasoseptal Flap Enhancement on Early Postoperative MRI Does Not Predict 3-Month Enhancement nor Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Risk.

Pahlevani M, Mukhaelyan A, Angel K, Mallari R, Griffiths C, Kelly D Neurosurg Pract. 2025; 5(4):e00118.

PMID: 39959542 PMC: 11810033. DOI: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000118.


Endoscopic septal perforation repair by endonasal flap: a technique using mobilized septal bone or cartilage for support.

Omer G, Di Girolamo S, Ali S, Kareem R, Abdullah A, Maurizi R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(3):1335-1343.

PMID: 39668223 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-09136-4.


Reuse of Nasoseptal Flaps for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction.

Bobeff E, Mathios D, Longo D, Estin J, Joshua S, Tabaee A J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024; 85(5):517-525.

PMID: 39228881 PMC: 11368453. DOI: 10.1055/a-2122-7587.


[Clinical analysis of resection and dura skull base reconstruction of cranionasal communication tumor in 31 cases].

Gu H, Zhang E, Li B, Shi L, He M, Xu S Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(6):496-502.

PMID: 38858114 PMC: 11480574. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.06.008.


Sphenoid Sinus Mucosal Flap after Transsphenoidal Surgery-A Systematic Review.

Sumislawski P, Piotrowska M, Regelsberger J, Flitsch J, Rotermund R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(2).

PMID: 38399569 PMC: 10890001. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020282.


References
1.
Thorp B, Sreenath S, Ebert C, Zanation A . Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 37(4):E4. DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.FOCUS14350. View

2.
Kerr E, Jamshidi A, Carrau R, Campbell R, Filho L, Otto B . Indocyanine Green Fluorescence to Evaluate Nasoseptal Flap Viability in Endoscopic Endonasal Cranial Base Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017; 78(5):408-412. PMC: 5582965. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602777. View

3.
Husain Q, Sanghvi S, Kovalerchik O, Shukla P, Choudhry O, Liu J . Assessment of mucocele formation after endoscopic nasoseptal flap reconstruction of skull base defects. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2013; 4(1):e27-31. PMC: 3679564. DOI: 10.2500/ar.2013.4.0050. View

4.
Soudry E, Psaltis A, Lee K, Vaezafshar R, Nayak J, Hwang P . Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2014; 125(1):80-5. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24863. View

5.
Chabot J, Patel C, Hughes M, Wang E, Snyderman C, Gardner P . Nasoseptal flap necrosis: a rare complication of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2017; 128(5):1463-1472. DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS161582. View