» Articles » PMID: 30194672

Accuracy of Remote Continuous Respiratory Rate Monitoring Technologies Intended for Low Care Clinical Settings: a Prospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal Can J Anaesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2018 Sep 9
PMID 30194672
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Altered respiratory rate (RR) has been identified as an important predictor of serious adverse events during hospitalization. Introduction of a well-tolerated continuous RR monitor could potentially reduce serious adverse events such as opioid-induced respiratory depression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of different monitor devices to detect RR in low care clinical settings.

Methods: This was a prospective method-comparison study with a cross-sectional design. Thoracic impedance pneumography (IPG), frequency modulated continuous wave radar, and an acoustic breath sounds monitor were compared with the gold standard of capnography for their ability to detect RR in breaths per minute (breaths·min) in awake postoperative patients in the postanesthesia care unit. The Bland and Altman method for repeated measurements and mixed effect modelling was used to obtain bias and limits of agreement (LoA). Furthermore, the ability of the three devices to assist with correct treatment decisions was evaluated in Clarke Error Grids.

Results: Twenty patients were monitored for 1,203 min, with a median [interquartile range] of 61 [60-63] min per patient. The bias (98.9% LoA) were 0.1 (-7.9 to 7.9) breaths·min for the acoustic monitor, -1.6 (-10.8 to 7.6) for the radar, and -1.9 (-13.1 to 9.2) for the IPG. The extent to which the monitors guided adequate or led to inadequate treatment decisions (determined by Clarke Error Grid analysis) differed significantly between the monitors (P = 0.011). Decisions were correct 96% of the time for acoustic, 95% of the time for radar, and 94% of the time for IPG monitoring devices.

Conclusions: None of the studied devices (acoustic, IPG, and radar monitor) had LoA that were within our predefined (based on clinical judgement) limits of ± 2 breaths·min. The acoustic breath sound monitor predicted the correct treatment more often than the IPG and the radar device.

Citing Articles

Contactless radar-based breathing monitoring of premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Beltrao G, Stutz R, Hornberger F, Martins W, Tatarinov D, Alaee-Kerahroodi M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5150.

PMID: 35338172 PMC: 8956695. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08836-3.


A capaciflector provides continuous and accurate respiratory rate monitoring for patients at rest and during exercise.

Hayward N, Shaban M, Badger J, Jones I, Wei Y, Spencer D J Clin Monit Comput. 2022; 36(5):1535-1546.

PMID: 35040037 PMC: 8763619. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00798-7.


Preclinical evaluation of noncontact vital signs monitoring using real-time IR-UWB radar and factors affecting its accuracy.

Park J, Lee Y, Heo R, Park H, Cho S, Cho S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23602.

PMID: 34880335 PMC: 8655004. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03069-2.


Validation of a New Contactless and Continuous Respiratory Rate Monitoring Device Based on Ultra-Wideband Radar Technology.

Lauteslager T, Maslik M, Siddiqui F, Marfani S, Leschziner G, Williams A Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(12).

PMID: 34207961 PMC: 8230718. DOI: 10.3390/s21124027.


Classifying signals from a wearable accelerometer device to measure respiratory rate.

Drummond G, Fischer D, Lees M, Bates A, Mann J, Arvind D ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(2).

PMID: 33937389 PMC: 8071973. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00681-2020.


References
1.
Freundlich J, Erickson J . Electrical impedance pneumography for simple nonrestrictive continuous monitoring of respiratory rate, rhythm and tidal volume for surgical patients. Chest. 1974; 65(2):181-4. DOI: 10.1378/chest.65.2.181. View

2.
van Loon K, Breteler M, van Wolfwinkel L, Rheineck Leyssius A, Kossen S, Kalkman C . Wireless non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring with FMCW radar: a clinical validation study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015; 30(6):797-805. PMC: 5082588. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9777-5. View

3.
Odell M, Victor C, Oliver D . Nurses' role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2010; 65(10):1992-2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05109.x. View

4.
Casati A, GALLIOLI G, Scandroglio M, Passaretta R, Borghi B, Torri G . Accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring using the NBP-75 microstream capnometer. A study in intubated ventilated and spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000; 17(10):622-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00731.x. View

5.
Ramsay M, Usman M, Lagow E, Mendoza M, Untalan E, De Vol E . The accuracy, precision and reliability of measuring ventilatory rate and detecting ventilatory pause by rainbow acoustic monitoring and capnometry. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318290c798. View