» Articles » PMID: 30182349

Oncoplastic Breast Consortium Consensus Conference on Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

Abstract

Purpose: Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion.

Methods: The panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology.

Results: Consensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference.

Conclusions: In case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques.

Citing Articles

Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation.

Swanson E Ann Plast Surg. 2025; 94(3):263-268.

PMID: 39903578 PMC: 11902608. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004239.


Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations.

Piroth M, Krug D, Baumann R, Strnad V, Borm K, Combs S Strahlenther Onkol. 2025; .

PMID: 39786586 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02334-3.


Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.

Singh P, Agnese D, Amin M, Barrio A, van den Bruele A, Burke E Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(2):899-911.

PMID: 39538100 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16484-2.


Feasible Nipple Preservation Techniques for Breast Cancer with Slight Nipple Retraction.

Matsuki H, Oura S Case Rep Oncol. 2024; 17(1):1014-1018.

PMID: 39474556 PMC: 11521478. DOI: 10.1159/000540892.


Evaluation of Breast Skin/Nipple-Areolar Complex Sensation and Quality of Life after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Followed by Reconstruction.

Soares Domingues Polita B, Lapins J, gilis A, Grucki M, Irmejs A, Gardovskis J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459441 PMC: 11509290. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101655.


References
1.
Matsen C, Mehrara B, Eaton A, Capko D, Berg A, Stempel M . Skin Flap Necrosis After Mastectomy With Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 23(1):257-64. PMC: 4697877. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4709-7. View

2.
Lohsiriwat V, Martella S, Rietjens M, Botteri E, Rotmensz N, Mastropasqua M . Paget's disease as a local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and risk factor analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(6):1850-5. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2226-5. View

3.
Jackson R, Sanders T, Park A, Buras R, Liang W, Harris C . Prospective Study Comparing Surgeons' Pain and Fatigue Associated with Nipple-Sparing versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(10):3024-3031. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5929-9. View

4.
Bailey C, Ogbuagu O, Baltodano P, Simjee U, Manahan M, Cooney D . Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140(2):219-226. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003505. View

5.
DAlonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, Pisacane A, Maggiorotto F, De Rosa G . Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(15):2311-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.017. View