Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Loss of the nipple-areola complex can be psychologically and sexually devastating. Nipple-sparing mastectomy provides robust cosmetic results, but few studies have investigated the quality-of-life outcomes associated with it.
Methods: The authors performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based or autologous reconstruction and 32 control patients who underwent non-nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction matched by reconstruction type and operative period. They then compared premastectomy and postreconstruction responses to the BREAST-Q, a validated and breast reconstruction-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, within and between their study and control populations.
Results: The nipple-sparing and non-nipple-sparing mastectomy groups were statistically similar in terms of mean age [49.9 ± 8.5 years (range, 36 to 69 years) and 47.7 ± 10.3 years (range, 26 to 68 years) (p = 0.29), respectively] and mean body mass index [24.3 ± 3.5 kg/m (range, 17.9 to 33.7 kg/m) and 25.5 ± 5.4 kg/m (range, 19.2 to 39.2 kg/m) (p = 0.29), respectively]. There were no significant between-group differences in occurrence of postreconstruction complications. The authors found significantly higher mean postreconstruction scores in the nipple-sparing mastectomy group within the Satisfaction with Breasts (p = 0.039) and the Satisfaction with Outcome (p = 0.017) domains. Finally, they noted higher median postreconstruction scores in the nipple-sparing mastectomy group within the Psychosocial Well-being (p = 0.043) and Satisfaction with Breasts (p = 0.004) domains.
Conclusions: Psychological concerns regarding malignancy may negatively impact premastectomy patient quality of life. Reconstructive surgery improves patients' postmastectomy quality of life. Nipple-sparing mastectomy appears to provide significantly better improvement in postreconstruction quality of life, specifically in the Satisfaction with Breasts and Satisfaction with Outcome domains of the BREAST-Q, compared with non-nipple-sparing mastectomies.
Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation.
Swanson E Ann Plast Surg. 2025; 94(3):263-268.
PMID: 39903578 PMC: 11902608. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004239.
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in young versus elderly patients.
Frasson A, Miranda I, Vollbrecht B, Malhone C, Falcone A, Barbosa F Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.
PMID: 39530073 PMC: 11554330. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo90.
Kooijman M, van Bommel A, van Duijnhoven F, Scholten A, Smorenburg C, Woerdeman L Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 155(3):469e-478e.
PMID: 39315798 PMC: 11845074. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011744.
Xu X, Gao X, Pan C, Hou J, Zhang L, Lin S J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):274.
PMID: 38951387 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02030-5.
Amador R, Taylor E, Leung N, Sokol B, Lafleur E, Hashemian T Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(5):e5807.
PMID: 38746945 PMC: 11093569. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005807.