» Articles » PMID: 30181387

Cyclin E Overexpression Sensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Wee1 Kinase Inhibition

Abstract

Purpose: Poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is due to an aggressive phenotype and lack of biomarker-driven targeted therapies. Overexpression of cyclin E and phosphorylated-CDK2 are correlated with poor survival in patients with TNBC, and the absence of CDK2 desensitizes cells to inhibition of Wee1 kinase, a key cell-cycle regulator. We hypothesize that cyclin E expression can predict response to therapies, which include the Wee1 kinase inhibitor, AZD1775.

Experimental Design: Mono- and combination therapies with AZD1775 were evaluated in TNBC cell lines and multiple patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with different cyclin E expression profiles. The mechanism(s) of cyclin E-mediated replicative stress were investigated following cyclin E induction or CRISPR/Cas9 knockout by a number of assays in multiple cell lines.

Results: Cyclin E overexpression (i) is enriched in TNBCs with high recurrence rates, (ii) sensitizes TNBC cell lines and PDX models to AZD1775, (iii) leads to CDK2-dependent activation of DNA replication stress pathways, and (iv) increases Wee1 kinase activity. Moreover, treatment of cells with either CDK2 inhibitors or carboplatin leads to transient transcriptional induction of cyclin E (in cyclin E-low tumors) and result in DNA replicative stress. Such drug-mediated cyclin E induction in TNBC cells and PDX models sensitizes them to AZD1775 in a sequential treatment combination strategy. Cyclin E is a potential biomarker of response (i) for AZD1775 as monotherapy in cyclin E-high TNBC tumors and (ii) for sequential combination therapy with CDK2 inhibitor or carboplatin followed by AZD1775 in cyclin E-low TNBC tumors.

Citing Articles

Molecular principles underlying aggressive cancers.

Nussinov R, Yavuz B, Jang H Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):42.

PMID: 39956859 PMC: 11830828. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-025-02129-7.


Cyclin E1/CDK2 activation defines a key vulnerability to WEE1 kinase inhibition in gynecological cancers.

Kim D, Chung H, Liu W, Jeong K, Ozmen T, Ozmen F NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025; 9(1):3.

PMID: 39755818 PMC: 11700143. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00787-4.


Pan-cancer analysis identifies the oncogenic role of in human cancers.

Ouyang Y, Wu Z, Aili D, Yang C, Zhang H, Wu T Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(21):13392-13408.

PMID: 39591374 PMC: 11719100. DOI: 10.18632/aging.206163.


WEE1 inhibition delays resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor and antiestrogen treatment in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

He W, Demas D, Kraikivski P, Shajahan-Haq A, Baumann W bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345487 PMC: 11429701. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.15.613122.


DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.

Li J, Jia Z, Dong L, Cao H, Huang Y, Xu H Biomark Res. 2024; 12(1):111.

PMID: 39334297 PMC: 11437670. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00653-2.


References
1.
Hughes B, Sidorova J, Swanger J, Monnat Jr R, Clurman B . Essential role for Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation during replication stress revealed by a human Cdk2 knockin mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(22):8954-9. PMC: 3670391. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302927110. View

2.
Aarts M, Sharpe R, Garcia-Murillas I, Gevensleben H, Hurd M, Shumway S . Forced mitotic entry of S-phase cells as a therapeutic strategy induced by inhibition of WEE1. Cancer Discov. 2012; 2(6):524-39. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0320. View

3.
Bunz F, Dutriaux A, Lengauer C, Waldman T, Zhou S, Brown J . Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science. 1998; 282(5393):1497-501. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1497. View

4.
Morris G, Naidu S, Topham A, Guiles F, Xu Y, McCue P . Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African-American and Caucasian patients: a single-institution compilation compared with the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2007; 110(4):876-84. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22836. View

5.
OConnor M . Targeting the DNA Damage Response in Cancer. Mol Cell. 2015; 60(4):547-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.040. View