» Articles » PMID: 22145124

Patient-reported Outcomes: A New Era in Clinical Research

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Dec 7
PMID 22145124
Citations 317
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Now-a-days there is significant discussion about patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in medical world. The following article covers almost all the areas of PRO including-their importance, important concepts for understanding of PRO, significance, ideal properties, types, development and evaluation of PRO instruments. It is useful for physicians, pharmacists and patients for the assessment and improvement of the therapy.

Citing Articles

Using Virtual Reality to Improve Outcomes Related to Quality of Life Among Older Adults With Serious Illnesses: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Maheta B, Kraft A, Interrante N, Fereydooni S, Bailenson J, Beams B J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e54452.

PMID: 40009834 PMC: 11904368. DOI: 10.2196/54452.


Measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetic retinopathy in northern India: a comparison of generic and vision specific instruments.

Purohit N, Goyal A, Gupta V, Gupta P, Singh P, Prinja S Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025; 23(1):17.

PMID: 39985016 PMC: 11846259. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-025-02340-8.


Validation of a Six-Item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale Short Form (MSIS-SF) for Efficient Assessment of Patient-Reported Physical Disturbance.

Sumowski J, Levy S medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974136 PMC: 11838650. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.06.25321807.


Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study.

Floyd S, Sutton J, Okon M, McCarthy M, Fisher L, Judkins B J Particip Med. 2025; 17:e60263.

PMID: 39847773 PMC: 11809615. DOI: 10.2196/60263.


Impact of a Long-Term Home-Based Rehabilitation Program on Quality of Life, Balance, and Autonomy in Adults with Disabilities.

Barria P, Andrade A, Yelincic A, Cordova B, Covarrubias-Escudero F, Cifuentes C J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39846665 PMC: 11755656. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010024.


References
1.
Cook D, Beckman T . Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119(2):166.e7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036. View

2.
Kozma C, Reeder C, Schulz R . Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research. Clin Ther. 1993; 15(6):1121-32; discussion 1120. View

3.
Coons S, Gwaltney C, Hays R, Lundy J, Sloan J, Revicki D . Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2009; 12(4):419-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. View

4.
Miller R, Walsh T . Psychosocial aspects of palliative care in advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991; 6(1):24-9. DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90068-f. View

5.
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M, Jones D . Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2(14):i-iv, 1-74. View