» Articles » PMID: 30167069

[Treatment of Foreign Bodies in the Upper Third of the Esophagus Without Endoscopy: is It a Challenge for Practitioners Working in Isolation?]

Overview
Journal Pan Afr Med J
Date 2018 Sep 1
PMID 30167069
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The treatment of foreign bodies in the upper third of the esophagus is well codified and it is more often based on endoscopic treatment. This specific instrument as well as gastroenterologists trained in its use are sometimes missing in African countries. Physicians have to use alternative approaches to treat this disease. This study aimed to evaluate the procedure for the removal of foreign bodies in the upper third of the esophagus carried out by anaesthetists-resuscitators in a medical and surgical center in Chad. Thirty seven cases of foreign body removal in children aged 0-15 years were analyzed. Coins and lithium batteries were removed in 92% and 8% of cases respectively. Foley balloon catheter was used in 43.2% of cases and laryngoscopy forceps in 56.8% of cases. One case of therapeutic failure requiring cervicotomy was recorded in each group. Four minor complications were reported in the "laryngoscopy forceps group", no complication in the "Foley" group. Physicians must have adequate preparation for the removal of a foreign body in the upper third of the esophagus. In case of unavailability of endoscope, other alternative techniques can be used with a satisfying success rate. In case of failure, surgery may be necessary.

Citing Articles

Foreign body ingestion in children: Clinical features and complications.

Trabelsi I, Kbaier S, Daoued Y, Lachiheb A, Brini I, Khalsi F Tunis Med. 2025; 102(12):1040-1043.

PMID: 39748691 PMC: 11770785. DOI: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.4857.

References
1.
Wadie G, Konefal S, Dias M, McLaughlin M . Cervical spondylodiscitis from an ingested pin: a case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(3):593-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.11.023. View

2.
Gupta N, Kaman L . Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg. 2004; 187(1):58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.11.004. View

3.
Farmakakis T, Dessypris N, Alexe D, Frangakis C, Petoussis G, Malliori M . Magnitude and object-specific hazards of aspiration and ingestion injuries among children in Greece. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 71(2):317-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.10.021. View

4.
Laugel V, Beladdale J, Escande B, Simeoni U . [Accidental ingestion of button battery]. Arch Pediatr. 1999; 6(11):1231-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)86309-5. View

5.
Palta R, Sahota A, Bemarki A, Salama P, Simpson N, Laine L . Foreign-body ingestion: characteristics and outcomes in a lower socioeconomic population with predominantly intentional ingestion. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 69(3 Pt 1):426-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.072. View