» Articles » PMID: 15221361

Severe Esophageal Damage Due to Button Battery Ingestion: Can It Be Prevented?

Overview
Date 2004 Jun 29
PMID 15221361
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Batteries represent less than 2% of foreign bodies ingested by children, but in the last 2 decades, the frequency has continuously increased. Most ingestions have an uneventful course, but those that lodge in the esophagus can lead to serious complications and even death. Medline was used to search the English medical literature, combining "button battery" and "esophageal burn" as keywords. Cases were studied for type, size, and source of the batteries; duration and location of the battery impaction in the esophagus; symptoms; damage caused by the battery; and outcome. Nineteen cases of esophageal damage have been reported since 1979. Batteries less than 15 mm in diameter almost never lodged in the esophagus. Only 3% of button batteries were larger than 20 mm but were responsible for the severe esophageal injuries in this series. These data suggest that manufacturers should replace large batteries with smaller ones and thus eliminate most of the complications. When the battery remains in the esophagus, endoscopic examination and removal done urgently will allow assessment of the esophageal damage, and treatment can be tailored accordingly. There is a need for more public education about the dangers of battery ingestion; this information should be included as part of the routine guidelines for childproofing the home.

Citing Articles

Two-Month Duration of Esophageal Button Battery Impaction in a 23-Month-Old Boy: A Case Report.

Abaalkhail A, Alshehri Y, Almutairi A, Ajeebi A, Alotaibi M, Almutairi Z Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74134.

PMID: 39575362 PMC: 11579795. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74134.


Histopathological Analysis of Esophageal Damage Caused by Coin-Shaped Lithium Batteries in Living Piglets.

Ohashi S, Kanamori D, Kaji S, Uchida G, Sugihara T, Miyaguni K Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71598.

PMID: 39552998 PMC: 11566366. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71598.


A case of corrosive tracheoesophageal fistula: A complication of button battery ingestion.

Mlay K, Kipiki P, Minja B, Mtenga P, Sadiq A, Chussi D Clin Case Rep. 2024; 12(6):e8934.

PMID: 38799530 PMC: 11126639. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8934.


Arterio-Esophageal Fistula: A Complication of Button Battery Ingestion.

Almutairi R, Almania A, Alabood S, Alkarzae M Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43830.

PMID: 37746369 PMC: 10511826. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43830.


Foreign Body Ingestion: A Common Presentation Among Pediatric Age Group in the City of AlAhsa Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Al Ghadeer H, AlKadhem S, AlBisher A, AlAli N, Al Hassan A, Alrashed M Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31494.

PMID: 36532901 PMC: 9749913. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31494.


References
1.
Kost K, Shapiro R . Button battery ingestion: a case report and review of the literature. J Otolaryngol. 1987; 16(4):252-7. View

2.
Willis G, Ho W . Perforation of Meckel's diverticulum by an alkaline hearing aid battery. Can Med Assoc J. 1982; 126(5):497-8. PMC: 1863037. View

3.
Sigalet D, Lees G . Tracheoesophageal injury secondary to disc battery ingestion. J Pediatr Surg. 1988; 23(11):996-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(88)80003-4. View

4.
Shabino C, Feinberg A . Esophageal perforation secondary to alkaline battery ingestion. JACEP. 1979; 8(9):360-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0361-1124(79)80259-2. View

5.
KUHNS D, Dire D . Button battery ingestions. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18(3):293-300. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80417-2. View