» Articles » PMID: 30158138

The Effects of Male Harm Vary with Female Quality and Environmental Complexity in

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Aug 31
PMID 30158138
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mate competition provides the opportunity for sexual selection which often acts strongly on males, but also the opportunity for sexual conflict that can alter natural selection on females. Recent attention has focused on the potential of sexual conflict to weaken selection on females if male sexual attention, and hence harm, is disproportionately directed towards high- over low-quality females, thereby reducing the fitness difference between these females. However, sexual conflict could instead strengthen selection on females if low-quality females are more sensitive to male harm than high-quality females, thereby magnifying fitness differences between them. We quantify the effects of male exposure on low- versus high-quality females in in each of two environments ('simple' and 'complex') that are known to alter behavioural interactions. We show that the effects of male harm are greater for low- compared to high-quality females in the complex but not the simple environment, consistent with mate competition strengthening selection on females in the former but not in the latter environment.

Citing Articles

Thermal phenotypic plasticity of pre- and post-copulatory male harm buffers sexual conflict in wild .

Londono-Nieto C, Garcia-Roa R, Garcia-Co C, Gonzalez P, Carazo P Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37102499 PMC: 10191624. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84759.


Softness of selection and mating system interact to shape trait evolution under sexual conflict.

Richter X, Hollis B Evolution. 2021; 75(10):2335-2347.

PMID: 34396531 PMC: 9293156. DOI: 10.1111/evo.14329.


Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity.

Bagchi B, Corbel Q, Khan I, Payne E, Banerji D, Liljestrand-Ronn J BMC Biol. 2021; 19(1):114.

PMID: 34078377 PMC: 8170964. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01049-6.


Sexual conflict in a changing environment.

Plesnar-Bielak A, Lukasiewicz A Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 96(5):1854-1867.

PMID: 33960630 PMC: 8518779. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12728.


Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Martinossi-Allibert I, Thilliez E, Arnqvist G, Berger D Evol Appl. 2019; 12(7):1371-1384.

PMID: 31417621 PMC: 6691221. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12758.


References
1.
Colpitts J, Williscroft D, Sekhon H, Rundle H . The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments. Biol Lett. 2017; 13(10). PMC: 5665778. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0518. View

2.
Arbuthnott D, Rundle H . Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2012; 66(7):2127-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01584.x. View

3.
Yun L, Agrawal A . Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence. Evolution. 2014; 68(12):3599-606. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12527. View

4.
Yun L, Chen P, Singh A, Agrawal A, Rundle H . The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females. Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1858). PMC: 5524491. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0424. View

5.
Chenoweth S, Appleton N, Allen S, Rundle H . Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(14):1860-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.034. View