» Articles » PMID: 30155294

Early Cervical Cancer: Predictive Relevance of Preoperative 3-Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Aug 30
PMID 30155294
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We assess the predictive significance of preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI findings.

Methods: A total of 260 patients with FIGO IA2-IIA cervical cancer underwent primary surgical treatment between 2007 and 2016. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the incremental prognostic significance.

Results: The clinical predictive factors associated with pT2b disease were MRI parametrial invasion (PMI) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.77, 95% confidence interval(CI) 1.62-8.79; P=0.02) and MRI uterine corpus invasion (UCI) (AOR 9.99, 95% CI 4.11-24.32; P<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, for underdiagnoses, histologically squamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma (AOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06-4.07; P=0.034) and MRI tumor size (AOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92; P=0.005) were significant predictors; for overdiagnoses, these results were MRI tumor size (AOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.16; P=0.023), MRI PMI (AOR 71.73, 95% CI 8.89-611.38; P<0.0001) and MRI UCI (AOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.01-1.01; P=0.051).

Conclusion: PMI and UCI on T2-weighted images through preoperative 3T MRI are useful coefficients for accurate prediction of the pT2b stage; however, careful surveillance is required. Therefore, preoperative decision-making for early cervical cancer patients based on MRI diagnosis should be considered carefully, particularly in the presence of factors that are known to increase the likelihood of misdiagnosis.

Citing Articles

Integrating MRI-based radiomics and clinicopathological features for preoperative prognostication of early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma patients: in comparison to deep learning approach.

Qiu H, Wang M, Wang S, Li X, Wang D, Qin Y Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):101.

PMID: 39090668 PMC: 11292990. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00747-y.


Utility of Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Comparison to Pelvic MRI in Evaluation of Local Staging of Early-Stage Carcinoma Cervix.

Singaram N, Hulikal N, Devi B, Manthri R, Chowhan A Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32111.

PMID: 36601156 PMC: 9803860. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32111.


An MRI-based radiomics signature and clinical characteristics for survival prediction in early-stage cervical cancer.

Zheng R, Cai M, Lan L, Huang X, Yang Y, Powell M Br J Radiol. 2021; 95(1129):20210838.

PMID: 34797703 PMC: 8722251. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210838.


Useful MRI Findings for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Cervical Cancer.

Park B, Kim T Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(16).

PMID: 34439231 PMC: 8391577. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164078.


The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study.

Russo L, Gui B, Micco M, Panico C, De Vincenzo R, Fanfani F Radiol Med. 2021; 126(8):1055-1063.

PMID: 34060027 PMC: 8292245. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01377-1.


References
1.
AVERETTE H, Ford Jr J, Dudan R, Girtanner R, Hoskins W, Lutz M . Staging of cervical cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 18(3):215-32. DOI: 10.1097/00003081-197509000-00023. View

2.
van Nagell Jr J, RODDICK Jr J, Lowin D . The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findinges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 110(7):973-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90551-5. View

3.
Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi D, Amendola M, Brandt K, Schwartz L . Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(36):9329-37. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0354. View

4.
Matsuyama T, Inoue I, Tsukamoto N, Kashimura M, Kamura T, Saito T . Stage Ib, IIa, and IIb cervix cancer, postsurgical staging, and prognosis. Cancer. 1984; 54(12):3072-7. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841215)54:12<3072::aid-cncr2820541244>3.0.co;2-e. View

5.
Hricak H, Lacey C, Sandles L, Chang Y, Winkler M, Stern J . Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology. 1988; 166(3):623-31. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.3.3340756. View