» Articles » PMID: 30153491

Comparative Analysis of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil-Containing Regimens for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease After Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation

Abstract

The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) such as tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CYSP) with methotrexate (MTX) or with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been commonly used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), but there are limited data comparing efficacy of the 2 regimens. We evaluated 1564 adult patients who underwent RIC alloHCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) from 2000 to 2013 using HLA-identical sibling (matched related donor [MRD]) or unrelated donor (URD) peripheral blood graft and received CYSP or TAC with MTX or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes of the study were acute and chronic GVHD and overall survival (OS). The study divided the patient population into 4 cohorts based on regimen: MMF-TAC, MMF-CYSP, MTX-TAC, and MTX-CYSP. In the URD group, MMF-CYSP was associated with increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (relative risk [RR], 1.78; P < .001) and grade III to IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.93; P = .006) compared with MTX-TAC. In the URD group, use of MMF-TAC (versus MTX-TAC) lead to higher nonrelapse mortality. (hazard ratio, 1.48; P = .008). In either group, no there was no difference in chronic GVHD, disease-free survival, and OS among the GVHD prophylaxis regimens. For RIC alloHCT using MRD, there are no differences in outcomes based on GVHD prophylaxis. However, with URD RIC alloHCT, MMF-CYSP was inferior to MTX-based regimens for acute GVHD prevention, but all the regimens were equivalent in terms of chronic GVHD and OS. Prospective studies, targeting URD recipients are needed to confirm these results.

Citing Articles

Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Gavriilaki E, Papchianou E, Karavalakis G, Batsis I, Panteliadou A, Lazaridou A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(10).

PMID: 39458920 PMC: 11510389. DOI: 10.3390/ph17101279.


Comparison of Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis after "Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from 9/10 HLA Matched Unrelated Donor'' with Standard Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis after "10/10 HLA Matched Relative....

Yildirim M, Sayin S, Comert M, Safak Yilmaz E, Avcu F, Ural A Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2024; 18(3):227-239.

PMID: 39257713 PMC: 11381669. DOI: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i3.16103.


Role of Protein Phosphatases in Tumor Angiogenesis: Assessing PP1, PP2A, PP2B and PTPs Activity.

Fonodi M, Nagy L, Boratko A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 38999976 PMC: 11241275. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25136868.


Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host disease.

De Togni E, Cole O, Abboud R Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1304065.

PMID: 38380328 PMC: 10877010. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1304065.


Outcome improvement over time in reduced intensity conditioning hematopoietic transplantation: a 20-year experience.

Esquirol A, Garcia Cadenas I, Novelli S, Garrido A, Caballero A, Onate G Ann Hematol. 2023; 103(1):321-334.

PMID: 37971549 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05530-w.


References
1.
Kharfan-Dabaja M, Mhaskar R, Reljic T, Pidala J, Perkins J, Djulbegovic B . Mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in people receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (7):CD010280. PMC: 10945354. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010280.pub2. View

2.
Nieto Y, Patton N, Hawkins T, Spearing R, Bearman S, Jones R . Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil after nonmyeloablative matched-sibling donor allogeneic stem-cell transplantations conditioned with fludarabine and low-dose total body irradiation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006; 12(2):217-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.10.012. View

3.
Filipovich A, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard J, Lee S . National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11(12):945-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004. View

4.
Bejanyan N, Rogosheske J, DeFor T, Lazaryan A, Esbaum K, Holtan S . Higher Dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil Reduces Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015; 21(5):926-33. PMC: 4768800. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.023. View

5.
Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V . Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009; 15(12):1628-33. PMC: 2861656. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004. View