» Articles » PMID: 30144257

Long-term Results of Osseointegrated Implant-based Dental Rehabilitation in Oncology Patients Reconstructed with a Fibula Free Flap

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2018 Aug 26
PMID 30144257
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dental rehabilitation with conventional prostheses after microvascular jaw reconstruction is often unsuccessful because of the altered oral anatomy and the lack of adequate dentition for fixation.

Purpose: This retrospective study evaluated the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent jaws reconstruction with a fibula free flap and subsequent rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses.

Materials And Methods: In total, 21 patients were enrolled; 108 osseointegrated dental implants, positioned on 21 fibular free flaps were assessed. Follow-up examinations were performed according to a standardized protocol, including clinical and radiological evaluations. The mean follow-up after implant insertion was 90.2 (range, 20-204) months.

Results: The overall implant survival rate was 97.2% at the 12-month follow-up, 86.5% at 60 months, and 79.3% at 120 months. The rate of overall implant success was 95.4% at the 12-month follow-up, 73.5% at 60 months, and 64.7% at 120 months. Implant failure was more common in patients that had implants placed after they underwent radiation therapy. Peri-implantitis and mucositis were identified in 14.8% and 20.3% of surviving implants, respectively, at the 5- and 10-year follow-up. The risk of developing peri-implantitis was estimated to be higher (odds ratio = 1.5) for patients without connective tissue or skin grafts versus patients with one of them (18.2% vs 9.5%).

Conclusions: Long-term implant-related outcomes show that the survival rate of implants placed into the fibula is acceptable. Radiotherapy negatively impacts survival and success, in particular in the short and medium-term follow-up. Moreover, a relevant peri-implant bone resorption does occur over time and ultimately influences implants success, and it is mainly related to peri-implant gingival mucositis. In this regard skin or connective tissue grafts seem to offer an aid to manage this problem.

Citing Articles

Osteoradionecrosis in osseous free flaps after maxillofacial reconstruction: a single-center experience.

Fenske J, Lampert P, Nikolaidou E, Steffen C, Beck M, Neckel N Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1527149.

PMID: 39949741 PMC: 11821973. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1527149.


Peri-Implant Health and Perfusion Parameters in Patients After Microvascular Jaw Reconstruction: A Clinical Cohort Study.

Katz M, Ooms M, Heitzer M, Bock A, Vohl N, Kniha K Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025; 27(1):e70012.

PMID: 39936507 PMC: 11816001. DOI: 10.1111/cid.70012.


Dental Rehabilitation After Microvascular Reconstruction of Segmental Jaw Defects: A Ten-Year Follow-Up.

Zeman-Kuhnert K, Gaggl A, Bottini G, Walch B, Steiner C, Zimmermann G J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2.

PMID: 39860633 PMC: 11766339. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020628.


Implantoplasty-Aided Prosthetic Rehabilitation for the Management of Peri-Implantitis in Maxilla Reconstructed With Free Fibula Flap: A Clinical Report.

Yerramsetti A, Vijayamohan M, Rajan Peter M, Subhas P Case Rep Dent. 2025; 2025():7502566.

PMID: 39850946 PMC: 11756935. DOI: 10.1155/crid/7502566.


Dimensional changes in free gingival grafts at implant sites in the reconstructed mandible: a retrospective study.

Yu X, Wu C, Wang F, Ni J, Wu Y, Li C Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(9):467.

PMID: 39107492 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05860-7.