» Articles » PMID: 30133058

The System-neurophysiological Basis for How Methylphenidate Modulates Perceptual-attentional Conflicts During Auditory Processing

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Aug 23
PMID 30133058
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to selectively perceive and flexibly attend to relevant sensory signals in the environment is essential for action control. Whereas neuromodulation of sensory or attentional processing is often investigated, neuromodulation of interactive effects between perception and attention, that is, high attentional control demand when the relevant sensory information is perceptually less salient than the irrelevant one, is not well understood. To fill this gap, this pharmacological-electroencephalogram (EEG) study applied an intensity-modulated, focused-attention dichotic listening paradigm together with temporal EEG signal decomposition and source localization analyses. We used a double-blind MPH/placebo crossover design to delineate the effects of methylphenidate (MPH)-a dopamine/norepinephrine transporter blocker-on the resolution of perceptual-attentional conflicts, when perceptual saliency and attentional focus favor opposing ears, in healthy young adults. We show that MPH increased behavioral performance specifically in the condition with the most pronounced conflict between perceptual saliency and attentional focus. On the neurophysiological level, MPH effects in line with the behavioral data were observed after accounting for intraindividual variability in the signal. More specifically, MPH did not show an effect on stimulus-related processes but modulated the onset latency of processes between stimulus evaluation and responding. These modulations were further shown to be associated with activation differences in the temporoparietal junction (BA40) and the superior parietal cortex (BA7) and may reflect neuronal gain modulation principles. The findings provide mechanistic insights into the role of modulated dopamine/norepinephrine transmitter systems for the interactions between perception and attention.

Citing Articles

Neurophysiological insights into catecholamine-dependent tDCS modulation of cognitive control.

Koyun A, Wendiggensen P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):375.

PMID: 40050533 PMC: 11885824. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07805-6.


Neurobiological influences on event perception: the role of catecholamines.

Ghorbani F, Zhou X, Roessner V, Hommel B, Prochnow A, Beste C Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025; 28(2).

PMID: 39981699 PMC: 11879076. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf008.


Effects of Catecholaminergic and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Response Inhibition.

Koyun A, Wendiggensen P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock A Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024; 27(6).

PMID: 38742426 PMC: 11184454. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae023.


The Ability to Voluntarily Regulate Theta Band Activity Affects How Pharmacological Manipulation of the Catecholaminergic System Impacts Cognitive Control.

Prochnow A, Muckschel M, Eggert E, Senftleben J, Frings C, Munchau A Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024; 27(1).

PMID: 38181228 PMC: 10810285. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae003.


Unsigned surprise but not reward magnitude modulates the integration of motor elements during actions.

Jamous R, Takacs A, Frings C, Munchau A, Muckschel M, Beste C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5379.

PMID: 37009782 PMC: 10068803. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32508-5.


References
1.
Larson M, Clayson P, Clawson A . Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014; 93(3):283-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007. View

2.
Servan-Schreiber D, Printz H, Cohen J . A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. Science. 1990; 249(4971):892-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.2392679. View

3.
Salinas E, Sejnowski T . Gain modulation in the central nervous system: where behavior, neurophysiology, and computation meet. Neuroscientist. 2001; 7(5):430-40. PMC: 2887717. DOI: 10.1177/107385840100700512. View

4.
Ouyang G, Herzmann G, Zhou C, Sommer W . Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. Psychophysiology. 2011; 48(12):1631-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01269.x. View

5.
Muckschel M, Stock A, Beste C . Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 24(8):2120-9. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht066. View