» Articles » PMID: 30128870

Effect of Cesarean Section on the Severity of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Chinese Women: The Shanxi Study

Overview
Journal Curr Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Aug 22
PMID 30128870
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most adverse obstetric outcomes. Our aim is to detect the risks of multilevel PPH in different cesarean section (CS) groups [including nulliparous CS with indications, nulliparous CS without indications, repeat cesarean (RC), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), cesarean after vaginal birth (CAVB)]. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, and the data on 127 145 women collected from January 2014 to May 2016 and from 35 tertiary hospitals in Shanxi province, China, were reviewed. Based on the measuring results of PPH, an ordered logistic regression model was used to analyze the adjusted PPH risks for each of the CS groups, and comparisons were drawn between them. Finally, a total of 99 066 nulliparous (77.92%) and 28 079 multiparous (22.08%) women were observed. The number of CS cases was 61 117, and the rate for CS was 48.07%. A total of 10 029 women did not show indications for CS and accounted for 16.41% of the CS parturient, whereas 9103 women underwent a repeated cesarean, with a CS frequency of 14.89%. The number of VBAC cases was 989, whose rate was 9.88% in prior CS women. The number (proportions) of PPH was 3658 (2.88%) in LI (PPH volume: ≥900 and <1500 mL), 520 (0.41%) in 12 (PPH volume: >1500 and <2100 mL), and 201 (0.16%) in L3 (PPH volume: ≥2100 mL). The Ln (n=l, 2,3, etc.) represented the increasing order of PPH severity. In the adjusted results, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) as the reference group, in the adjusted result for nulliparous, there was a decreased PPH risk in CS with indications (OR: 2.32; CI: 2.04-2.62), which was lower than that of CS without indications (OR: 2.50; CI: 2.01-2.96). The highest PPH risk in all subgroups (i.e. nulliparous and multiparous groups) was observed in the RC (OR: 3.61; CI: 3.16-4.17), which was nearly twice higher than that of the VBAC (OR: 1.82; CI: 1.33-2.52). CAVB (OR: 1.03; CI: 0.65-1.62) showed no significant difference with the reference group. Thus, we deemed that CS should be avoided in nulliparous pregnancies unless indicated, to prevent or reduce the rates for the use of RC or VBAC which are high risks of severe PPH to the parturient women.

Citing Articles

Developing a streamlined risk-adjusted cesarean section rate model for evaluation of obstetrical quality across hospitals by using EHRs: A provincial-scale multicenter retrospective study.

Zhou D, Zhong W, Sun Q, Fu Q, Liu P, Zhong S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241284726.

PMID: 39444733 PMC: 11497512. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241284726.


A comparative analysis of Postpartum Hemorrhage incidence and influencing factors between nulliparous and multiparous women in Hunan Province, China: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Bestman P, Nget M, Kolleh E, Moeng E, Brhane T, Fang J Prev Med Rep. 2024; 38:102580.

PMID: 38375184 PMC: 10874836. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102580.


Duration time of labor progression for pregnant women of vaginal birth after cesarean in Hubei, China.

Li H, Yang L, Peng J, Cheng W, Ma H, Wu S Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(3):1351-1358.

PMID: 38169049 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03600-6.


The utero-tonic effects of low dose intravenous ketamine in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia; A randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Haghighi M, Soltanipour S, Farzi F, Ghanaie M, Biazar G, Malekzadeh A Caspian J Intern Med. 2023; 14(2):218-225.

PMID: 37223287 PMC: 10201121. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.14.2.218.


Rotational thromboelastometry during Cesarean section as a predictive evaluation for the progression of persistent postpartum hemorrhage in parturients with placenta previa: A prospective observational study.

Shin H, Nam S, Koo B, Kim J, Hwang J, Do S Heliyon. 2023; 9(2):e13563.

PMID: 36846658 PMC: 9950826. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13563.


References
1.
McMahon M, Luther E, BOWES Jr W, Olshan A . Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(10):689-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001. View

2.
Karlstrom A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I . Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study. BJOG. 2013; 120(4):479-86. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12129. View

3.
Stafford I, Dildy G, Clark S, Belfort M . Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(5):519.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.049. View

4.
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu A, Souza J, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P . Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010; 375(9713):490-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5. View

5.
Liu Y, Wang X, Zou L, Ruan Y, Zhang W . An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(7):e5509. PMC: 5319487. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005509. View