» Articles » PMID: 17296957

Maternal Mortality and Severe Morbidity Associated with Low-risk Planned Cesarean Delivery Versus Planned Vaginal Delivery at Term

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2007 Feb 14
PMID 17296957
Citations 215
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The rate of elective primary cesarean delivery continues to rise, owing in part to the widespread perception that the procedure is of little or no risk to healthy women.

Methods: Using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database, we carried out a retrospective population-based cohort study of all women in Canada (excluding Quebec and Manitoba) who delivered from April 1991 through March 2005. Healthy women who underwent a primary cesarean delivery for breech presentation constituted a surrogate "planned cesarean group" considered to have undergone low-risk elective cesarean delivery, for comparison with an otherwise similar group of women who had planned to deliver vaginally.

Results: The planned cesarean group comprised 46,766 women v. 2,292,420 in the planned vaginal delivery group; overall rates of severe morbidity for the entire 14-year period were 27.3 and 9.0, respectively, per 1000 deliveries. The planned cesarean group had increased postpartum risks of cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-6.3), wound hematoma (OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6-5.5), hysterectomy (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2-4.8), major puerperal infection (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.7-3.4), anesthetic complications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0-2.6), venous thromboembolism (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.2) and hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8), and stayed in hospital longer (adjusted mean difference 1.47 d, 95% CI 1.46-1.49 d) than those in the planned vaginal delivery group, but a lower risk of hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). Absolute risk increases in severe maternal morbidity rates were low (e.g., for postpartum cardiac arrest, the increase with planned cesarean delivery was 1.6 per 1000 deliveries, 95% CI 1.2-2.1). The difference in the rate of in-hospital maternal death between the 2 groups was nonsignificant (p = 0.87).

Interpretation: Although the absolute difference is small, the risks of severe maternal morbidity associated with planned cesarean delivery are higher than those associated with planned vaginal delivery. These risks should be considered by women contemplating an elective cesarean delivery and by their physicians.

Citing Articles

Gestational weight gain and increased risk of cesarean delivery across body mass index categories.

McElfish P, Ayers B, Hawley N, Caldwell A, Porter A, Macechko M AJOG Glob Rep. 2025; 5(1):100445.

PMID: 40027475 PMC: 11869019. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100445.


Standardized protocol for labor induction: a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Hamm R, Benny J, Beidas R, Morales K, Srinivas S, Parry S Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 41:100956.

PMID: 39737251 PMC: 11683308. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100956.


Impact of Spinal Anesthesia Dosage in Elective Cesarean Section on the Duration of Stay in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit at the Women's Health Hospital, National Guard Health Affairs.

Alkinani A, Albabtean B, Alfaris H, Alarwan A, Al Harbi A, Alrajeh M Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75626.

PMID: 39677997 PMC: 11645514. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75626.


Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit.

Kujabi M, Housseine N, Kabanda I, Msumi R, Maembe L, Sangalala M AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(4):100404.

PMID: 39583576 PMC: 11582455. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100404.


When pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy meet: a multidisciplinary clinical experts review.

Dominoni M, Melito C, Schirinzi S, Ghio S, Scelsi L, Greco A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(6):2839-2852.

PMID: 39570387 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07827-1.


References
1.
Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Martin D, Easterling T . Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000; 283(18):2411-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.18.2411. View

2.
Hannah M, Hannah W, Hewson S, Hodnett E, Saigal S, Willan A . Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000; 356(9239):1375-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3. View

3.
. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107(6):1386-97. View

4.
Gregory K, Korst L, Gornbein J, Platt L . Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37(5):1387-401. PMC: 1464023. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.10762. View

5.
Allen V, OConnell C, Liston R, Baskett T . Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102(3):477-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00570-2. View