Switching to Coformulated Rilpivirine (RPV), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Tenofovir Alafenamide from Either RPV, FTC and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) or Efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week Results from Two Randomized Clinical Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The single-tablet regimen rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (RPV/FTC/TAF) for treatment of HIV-1-infected adults was approved based on bioequivalence. We assessed the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from either RPV/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF.
Methods: We conducted two distinct randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trials in participants taking RPV/FTC/TDF (Study 1216) and EFV/FTC/TDF (Study 1160). Each study randomized virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) adults (1:1) to switch to RPV/FTC/TAF or continue their current regimen for 96 weeks. We evaluated efficacy as the proportion with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL using the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and prespecified bone and renal endpoints at week 96.
Results: We randomized and treated 630 participants in Study 1216 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 316; RPV/FTC/TDF, n = 314) and 875 in Study 1160 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 438; EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 437). In both studies, the efficacy of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF was noninferior to that of continuing baseline therapy at week 96, with respective percentages of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL being 89.2% versus 88.5% in Study 1216 [difference 0.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to +5.8%] and 85.2% versus 85.1% in Study 1160 (difference 0%; 95% CI -4.8 to +4.8%). No participant on RPV/FTC/TAF developed treatment-emergent resistance versus two on EFV/FTC/TDF and one on RPV/FTC/TDF. Compared with continuing baseline therapy, significant improvements in bone mineral density and renal tubular markers were observed in the RPV/FTC/TAF groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was safe and effective and improved bone mineral density and renal biomarkers up to 96 weeks with no cases of treatment-emergent resistance.
Wu P, Lin H, Chen H, Huang P, Ke M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(12):e70275.
PMID: 39698519 PMC: 11653086. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70275.
Cardiometabolic health in people with HIV: expert consensus review.
Batterham R, Bedimo R, Diaz R, Guaraldi G, Lo J, Martinez E J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 79(6):1218-1233.
PMID: 38656584 PMC: 11144490. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae116.
Tenofovir amibufenamide tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B: A real-world study.
Peng W, Jiang C, Yang F, Zhou N, Chen K, Liu J World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(44):5907-5918.
PMID: 38111506 PMC: 10725562. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i44.5907.
Broadening access to tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection.
Osuala E, Naidoo A, Dooley K, Naidoo K, Perumal R Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 16(10):939-957.
PMID: 37612306 PMC: 10613124. DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2251387.
Ugwu E, Eleje G, Ugwu A, Nwagha U, Ikechebelu J, Umeh U Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD013653.
PMID: 37306558 PMC: 10259198. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013653.pub2.