» Articles » PMID: 30101539

Switching to Coformulated Rilpivirine (RPV), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Tenofovir Alafenamide from Either RPV, FTC and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) or Efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week Results from Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal HIV Med
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Aug 14
PMID 30101539
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The single-tablet regimen rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (RPV/FTC/TAF) for treatment of HIV-1-infected adults was approved based on bioequivalence. We assessed the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from either RPV/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF.

Methods: We conducted two distinct randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trials in participants taking RPV/FTC/TDF (Study 1216) and EFV/FTC/TDF (Study 1160). Each study randomized virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) adults (1:1) to switch to RPV/FTC/TAF or continue their current regimen for 96 weeks. We evaluated efficacy as the proportion with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL using the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and prespecified bone and renal endpoints at week 96.

Results: We randomized and treated 630 participants in Study 1216 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 316; RPV/FTC/TDF, n = 314) and 875 in Study 1160 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 438; EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 437). In both studies, the efficacy of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF was noninferior to that of continuing baseline therapy at week 96, with respective percentages of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL being 89.2% versus 88.5% in Study 1216 [difference 0.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to +5.8%] and 85.2% versus 85.1% in Study 1160 (difference 0%; 95% CI -4.8 to +4.8%). No participant on RPV/FTC/TAF developed treatment-emergent resistance versus two on EFV/FTC/TDF and one on RPV/FTC/TDF. Compared with continuing baseline therapy, significant improvements in bone mineral density and renal tubular markers were observed in the RPV/FTC/TAF groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was safe and effective and improved bone mineral density and renal biomarkers up to 96 weeks with no cases of treatment-emergent resistance.

Citing Articles

Metabolic Outcomes of Changing From Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine to Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine: A Longitudinal Study.

Wu P, Lin H, Chen H, Huang P, Ke M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(12):e70275.

PMID: 39698519 PMC: 11653086. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70275.


Cardiometabolic health in people with HIV: expert consensus review.

Batterham R, Bedimo R, Diaz R, Guaraldi G, Lo J, Martinez E J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 79(6):1218-1233.

PMID: 38656584 PMC: 11144490. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae116.


Tenofovir amibufenamide tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B: A real-world study.

Peng W, Jiang C, Yang F, Zhou N, Chen K, Liu J World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(44):5907-5918.

PMID: 38111506 PMC: 10725562. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i44.5907.


Broadening access to tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection.

Osuala E, Naidoo A, Dooley K, Naidoo K, Perumal R Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 16(10):939-957.

PMID: 37612306 PMC: 10613124. DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2251387.


Antivirals for prevention of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission in human immunodeficiency virus positive pregnant women co-infected with hepatitis B virus.

Ugwu E, Eleje G, Ugwu A, Nwagha U, Ikechebelu J, Umeh U Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD013653.

PMID: 37306558 PMC: 10259198. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013653.pub2.


References
1.
Orkin C, DeJesus E, Ramgopal M, Crofoot G, Ruane P, LaMarca A . Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide coformulated with rilpivirine and emtricitabine in virally suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3b, non-inferiority study. Lancet HIV. 2017; 4(5):e195-e204. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30031-0. View

2.
Ford N, Shubber Z, Pozniak A, Vitoria M, Doherty M, Kirby C . Comparative Safety and Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Efavirenz Use in First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015; 69(4):422-9. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000606. View

3.
Maggiolo F . Efavirenz: a decade of clinical experience in the treatment of HIV. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 64(5):910-28. PMC: 2760464. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp334. View

4.
Hall A, Hendry B, Nitsch D, Connolly J . Tenofovir-associated kidney toxicity in HIV-infected patients: a review of the evidence. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 57(5):773-80. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.022. View

5.
Goff Jr D, Lloyd-Jones D, Bennett G, Coady S, DAgostino R, Gibbons R . 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. View