» Articles » PMID: 30091190

Porcine Circovirus 3 is Highly Prevalent in Serum and Tissues and May Persistently Infect Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa Scrofa)

Abstract

Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3) prevalence has been minimally investigated in wild boar; dynamics of infection and viral tissue distribution are currently unknown. In this study, serum samples from 518 wild boar (from years 2004 to 2018) were used to study frequency of infection. Also, serum samples from 19 boar captured and recaptured at least two times for a period of time from 1 month to 1 year were collected to determine PCV-3 infection dynamics. Finally, to elucidate PCV-3 DNA organic distribution, sera, different tissues and faeces were obtained from 35 additional wild boar. PCV-3 DNA was extracted and amplified with a conventional PCR. For the PCV-3 PCR-positive sera from the longitudinally sampled and different tissue types, a quantitative PCR was performed. Genome sequence was obtained from a number of PCV-3 PCR-positive samples from different years, different time-points of infection and tissues. Obtained results confirmed the susceptibility of wild boar to the virus, showing high frequency of PCV-3 detection (221 out of 518, 42.66%) and demonstrating circulation at least since 2004. Compiled data indicate the possibility of long-term infections, since 5 out of 10 PCV-3 PCR-positive boars longitudinally sampled showed positivity in samplings separated for more than 5 months. All tested tissue types' harboured PCV-3 genome, with the highest percentage of PCR positivity in submandibular lymph node, tonsil, lung, liver, spleen and kidney. The amount of DNA in all tested PCV-3 PCR-positive samples was moderate to low. All partial and complete PCV-3 sequences obtained from wild boar displayed high nucleotide identity, higher than 98%. In conclusion, this study further confirms that wild boar is susceptible to PCV-3 infection, showing high frequency of detection in this animal species. Furthermore, PCV-3 can be found in different tissues of wild boar and is apparently able to cause persistent infection.

Citing Articles

Significant Detection of Porcine Circovirus 3 and Porcine Circovirus 4 in Wild Boars from Mid-Western Spain Without Apparent Sanitary Consequences.

Holgado-Martin R, Risco D, Ramos A, Martinez-Perez R, Garcia-Jimenez W, Hermoso-De Mendoza J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40003005 PMC: 11852179. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040523.


Surveillance and prevention of infection in clinical xenotransplantation.

Stewart A, Fishman J Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025; 38(1):e0015023.

PMID: 39887237 PMC: 11905366. DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00150-23.


Dynamics of PCV2 and PCV3 in the Serum and Oral Fluids of Pigs After PCV2 Vaccination in a Commercial Farm.

Hernandez J, Henao-Diaz A, Resendiz-Sandoval M, Cota-Valdez A, Mata-Haro V, Gimenez-Lirola L Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39771980 PMC: 11680165. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121318.


Detection and characterisation of porcine circoviruses in wild boars in northeastern Serbia.

Nisavic J, Milic N, Radalj A, Mirilovic M, Vejnovic B, Cosic M Vet Med (Praha). 2024; 67(3):131-137.

PMID: 39170598 PMC: 11334770. DOI: 10.17221/32/2021-VETMED.


Isolation of porcine circovirus 3 using primary porcine bone marrow-derived cells.

Hayashi S, Katakura F, Moritomo T, Tsutsumi N, Sugiura K, Sato T Virol J. 2024; 21(1):184.

PMID: 39135096 PMC: 11318261. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02463-2.


References
1.
Nieto D, Kekarainen T, Aramouni M, Segales J . Torque teno sus virus 1 and 2 distribution in tissues of porcine circovirus type 2-systemic disease affected and age-matched healthy pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 163(3-4):364-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.005. View

2.
Castillo-Contreras R, Carvalho J, Serrano E, Mentaberre G, Fernandez-Aguilar X, Colom A . Urban wild boars prefer fragmented areas with food resources near natural corridors. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 615:282-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.277. View

3.
Ellis J, Spinato M, Yong C, West K, McNeilly F, Meehan B . Porcine circovirus 2-associated disease in Eurasian wild boar. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2003; 15(4):364-8. DOI: 10.1177/104063870301500411. View

4.
Burland T . DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol. 1999; 132:71-91. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71. View

5.
Ruiz-Fons F, Segales J, Gortazar C . A review of viral diseases of the European wild boar: effects of population dynamics and reservoir rôle. Vet J. 2007; 176(2):158-69. PMC: 7110567. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.017. View