» Articles » PMID: 30075808

A Five-year Prospective Study of Spinal Radiographic Progression and Its Predictors in Men and Women with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2018 Aug 5
PMID 30075808
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Knowledge about predictors of new spinal bone formation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is limited. AS-related spinal alterations are more common in men; however, knowledge of whether predictors differ between sexes is lacking. Our objectives were to study spinal radiographic progression in patients with AS and investigate predictors of progression overall and by sex.

Methods: Swedish patients with AS, age (mean ± SD) 50 ± 13 years, were included in a longitudinal study. At baseline and at 5-year follow up, spinal radiographs were graded according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Predictors were assessed by questionnaires, spinal mobility tests and blood samples.

Results: Of 204 patients included, 166 (81%) were re-examined and 54% were men. Men had significantly higher mean mSASSS at baseline and higher mean increase in mSASSS than women (1.9 ± 2.8 vs. 1.2 ± 3.3; p = 0.005) More men than women developed new syndesmophytes (30% vs. 12%; p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression analyses with progression ≥ 2 mSASSS units over 5 years or development of new syndesmophytes as the dependent variable showed that presence of baseline AS-related spinal radiographic alterations and obesity (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.2) were independent predictors of spinal radiographic progression in both sexes. High C-reactive protein (CRP) was a significant predictor in men, with only a trend seen in women. Smoking predicted progression in men whereas high Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) and exposure to bisphosphonates during follow up (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.1 to 20.1) predicted progression in women.

Conclusion: This first report on sex-specific predictors of spinal radiographic progression shows that predictors may partly differ between the sexes. New predictors identified were obesity in both sexes and exposure to bisphosphonates in women. Among previously known predictors, baseline AS-related spinal radiographic alterations predicted radiographic progression in both sexes, high CRP was a predictor in men (with a trend in women) and smoking was a predictor only in men.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00858819 . Registered on 9 March 2009. Last updated 28 May 2015.

Citing Articles

Precision medicine in axial spondyloarthritis: current opportunities and future perspectives.

So J, Tam L Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024; 16:1759720X241284869.

PMID: 39376594 PMC: 11457172. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241284869.


Sex dimorphism of IL-17-secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells in ankylosing spondylitis based on bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.

Li S, Chao H, Li Z, Chen S, Zhang J, Hao W BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):490.

PMID: 38914997 PMC: 11194900. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07589-6.


Biomechanics in the onset and severity of spondyloarthritis: a force to be reckoned with.

Iyer P, Hwang M, Ridley L, Weisman M RMD Open. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 37949613 PMC: 10649803. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003372.


Physical function and sex differences in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis on Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index.

Hallstrom M, Klingberg E, Deminger A, Beckman Rehnman J, Geijer M, Forsblad-dElia H Arthritis Res Ther. 2023; 25(1):182.

PMID: 37749599 PMC: 10521572. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03173-w.


Impact of sex on spinal radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis: a longitudinal Swiss cohort analysis over a period of 10 years.

Ensslin C, Micheroli R, Kissling S, Gotschi A, Burki K, Bram R RMD Open. 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 37507208 PMC: 10387740. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003340.


References
1.
Lee W, Reveille J, Weisman M . Women with ankylosing spondylitis: a review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(3):449-54. DOI: 10.1002/art.23321. View

2.
Baraliakos X, Listing J, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Brandt J, Sieper J . Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66(7):910-5. PMC: 1955120. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.066415. View

3.
Kang K, Kwok S, Ju J, Park K, Park S, Hong Y . The predictors of development of new syndesmophytes in female patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014; 44(2):125-8. DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2014.938693. View

4.
Klingberg E, Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Geijer M, Gothlin J, Hilme E . Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis - prevalence, risk factors and methods of assessment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012; 14(3):R108. PMC: 3446485. DOI: 10.1186/ar3833. View

5.
Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy L, OHea J, Mallorie P . A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21(12):2281-5. View