» Articles » PMID: 37194094

Two-year Imaging Outcomes from a Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Secukinumab in Patients with Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Abstract

Background: Radiographic progression and course of inflammation over 2 years in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) from the phase 3, randomized, PREVENT study are reported here.

Methods: In the PREVENT study, adult patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for nr-axSpA with elevated CRP and/or MRI inflammation received secukinumab 150 mg or placebo. All patients received open-label secukinumab from week 52 onward. Sacroiliac (SI) joint and spinal radiographs were scored using the modified New York (mNY) grading (total sacroiliitis score; range, 0-8) and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS; range, 0-72), respectively. SI joint bone marrow edema (BME) was assessed using the Berlin Active Inflammatory Lesions Scoring (0-24) and spinal MRI using the Berlin modification of the AS spine MRI (ASspiMRI) scoring (0-69).

Results: Overall, 78.9% (438/555) of patients completed week 104 of the study. Over 2 years, minimal changes were observed in total radiographic SI joint scores (mean [SD] change, - 0.04 [0.49] and 0.04 [0.36]) and mSASSS scores (0.04 [0.47] and 0.07 [0.36]) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Most of the patients showed no structural progression (increase ≤ smallest detectable change) in SI joint score (87.7% and 85.6%) and mSASSS score (97.5% and 97.1%) in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Only 3.3% (n = 7) and 2.9% (n = 3) of patients in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups, respectively, who were mNY-negative at baseline were scored as mNY-positive at week 104. Overall, 1.7% and 3.4% of patients with no syndesmophytes at baseline in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab group, respectively, developed ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. Reduction in SI joint BME observed at week 16 with secukinumab (mean [SD], - 1.23 [2.81] vs - 0.37 [1.90] with placebo) was sustained through week 104 (- 1.73 [3.49]). Spinal inflammation on MRI was low at baseline (mean score, 0.82 and 1.07 in the secukinumab and placebo groups, respectively) and remained low (mean score, 0.56 at week 104).

Conclusion: Structural damage was low at baseline and most patients showed no radiographic progression in SI joints and spine over 2 years in the secukinumab and placebo-secukinumab groups. Secukinumab reduced SI joint inflammation, which was sustained over 2 years.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02696031.

Citing Articles

Upadacitinib in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year data from the phase 3 SELECT-AXIS 2 study.

Van den Bosch F, Deodhar A, Poddubnyy D, Maksymowych W, van der Heijde D, Kim T Arthritis Res Ther. 2025; 27(1):23.

PMID: 39905436 PMC: 11792409. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03441-3.


Advancements in Imaging Techniques for Early Diagnosis and Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Jeon H, Min H Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2024; 27(1):7.

PMID: 39663271 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-024-01172-7.


Impact of bimekizumab and certolizumab pegol on efficacy, safety and osteoblastic activity in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a phase IIa, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, exploratory study with PET-CT imaging.

Baraliakos X, de Jongh J, Poddubnyy D, Zwezerijnen G, Hemke R, Glatt S Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024; 16:1759720X241293944.

PMID: 39620046 PMC: 11605740. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241293944.


Real-Life Data of Secukinumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis: Patient Baseline Characteristics Data from the PROMPT Study.

Rattanakaemakorn P, Chevaisrakul P, Wongpraparut C, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Tovanabutra N, Tantiwong P Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(12):3229-3241.

PMID: 39505788 PMC: 11604867. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01299-6.


Precision medicine in axial spondyloarthritis: current opportunities and future perspectives.

So J, Tam L Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024; 16:1759720X241284869.

PMID: 39376594 PMC: 11457172. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241284869.


References
1.
Robinson P, Sengupta R, Siebert S . Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA): Advances in Classification, Imaging and Therapy. Rheumatol Ther. 2019; 6(2):165-177. PMC: 6514020. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-0146-6. View

2.
Poddubnyy D . Radiographic Evaluation of Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis - Still Worth Performing?. J Rheumatol. 2017; 44(1):1-3. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161232. View

3.
van Tubergen A, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Schulpen G, Landewe R, Wijers R, van der Heijde D . Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62(6):519-25. PMC: 1754576. DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.6.519. View

4.
Navarro-Compan V, van der Heijde D, Ahmad H, Miller C, Wolterbeek R, Landewe R . Measurement error in the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials: the smallest detectable change (SDC) revisited. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 73(6):1067-70. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202939. View

5.
Maksymowych W, Claudepierre P, de Hooge M, Lambert R, Landewe R, Molto A . Structural changes in the sacroiliac joint on MRI and relationship to ASDAS inactive disease in axial spondyloarthritis: a 2-year study comparing treatment with etanercept in EMBARK to a contemporary control cohort in DESIR. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021; 23(1):43. PMC: 7844996. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02428-8. View