» Articles » PMID: 30074162

Role of ICSI in Non-male Factor Cycles As the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Decreases from Four to One

Overview
Journal Curr Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Aug 4
PMID 30074162
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) shows an advantage over in vitro fertilization (IVF) in non-male factor cycles as the number of oocytes retrieved decreases from four to one. We undertook a retrospective analysis of 1305 IVF/ICSI cycles of non-male factor in which four or fewer oocytes were retrieved. Comparisons were made between conventional IVF (CI) and ICSI when one, two, three or four oocyte(s) were retrieved. Primary outcomes including normal fertilization rate, proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte, cycle cancellation rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (PR), live birth rate (LBR), cumulative PR and cumulative LBR were evaluated. The results showed that the normal fertilization rate (72.5% vs. 50.0%) and the proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte (72.5% vs. 55.0%) were significantly increased in one oocyte retrieved cycles in ICSI group as compared with CI group. However, the proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte was markedly decreased in ICSI group when three (52.3% vs. 61.3%) or four (56.9% vs. 64.0%) oocytes were retrieved. The implantation rates, clinical PRs, LBRs, cumulative PRs and cumulative LBRs in CI group were comparable to those in ICSI group when one, two, three or four oocyte(s) were retrieved. In conclusion, ICSI doesn't show advantages over IVF in low oocyte yield cycles of non-male factors, even when only one oocyte was retrieved.

Citing Articles

Reproductive Outcomes of Conventional In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Non-Severe Male Infertility Across Poor and Different Sub-Optimal Ovarian Response Categories: A Cohort Study Based on 30,352 Fresh....

Jiesisibieke D, Tian T, Zhu X, Fang S, Zhang N, Ma J Reprod Sci. 2024; 31(5):1353-1362.

PMID: 38228973 PMC: 11090916. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01444-0.


Opportunities and Limits of Conventional IVF versus ICSI: It Is Time to Come off the Fence.

Balli M, Cecchele A, Pisaturo V, Makieva S, Carullo G, Somigliana E J Clin Med. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36233589 PMC: 9572455. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195722.


Influence of Different Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Administration Methods on Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients Undergoing In-vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer.

Wu L, Ren X, Chen W, Huang B, Zhou Y, Jin L Curr Med Sci. 2019; 39(3):437-441.

PMID: 31209816 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2056-9.

References
1.
Kim J, Kim J, Jee B, Lee J, Suh C, Kim S . Can intracytoplasmic sperm injection prevent total fertilization failure and enhance embryo quality in patients with non-male factor infertility?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 178:188-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.044. View

2.
Sunkara S, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A . Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1768-74. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der106. View

3.
Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F, Molaei B, Aflatoonian A . Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014; 10(2):131-6. PMC: 4163275. View

4.
Dessolle L, Freour T, Barriere P, Darai E, Ravel C, Jean M . A cycle-based model to predict blastocyst transfer cancellation. Hum Reprod. 2009; 25(3):598-604. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep439. View

5.
Balasch J, Gratacos E . Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 29(4):263-73. DOI: 10.1159/000323142. View