Prognostic Factors of Neurological Complications in Spinal Surgeries

Overview

Journal Asian Spine J

Date 2018 Aug 1

PMID 30060384

Authors

Won Shik Shin

Dong Ki Ahn

Jung Soo Lee

Ki Hyuk Koo

In Seon Yoo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective study.

Purpose: To determine prognostic factors of neurological complications (NCs) of posterior thoracolumbar surgeries.

Overview Of Literature: There have been few reports on the prognosis of NCs according to the causes and treatment methods.

Methods: The subjects were 65 patients who had NCs for 19 years (1995-2013) after posterior thoracolumbar surgeries in Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital. The degree of neurological injury was assessed using numeric scales as follows: G1, increased leg pain or sensory loss; G2, hemiparesis; G3, paraparesis; G4, cauda equine syndrome; and G5, complete paraplegia. The relative degree of neurological recovery was evaluated using four numeric scales as follows: Gr1, complete recovery; Gr2, almost complete recovery with residual sensory loss or numbness; Gr3, partial recovery with apparent neurological deficit; and Gr4, no recovery. The prognostic factors were investigated in terms of demographic and surgical variables that were available in a retrospective review.

Results: The causes were as follows: epidural hematoma (EH), 25 patients (38.5%); insufficient decompression and fusion, 14 patients (21.5%); mechanical injury, 11 patients (16.9%); insufficient discectomy, four patients (6.2%); and unknown, 11 patients (23.1%). The grade of neurological injury was as follows: G1, 11 patients (16.9%); G2, 34 patients (52.3%); G3, 15 patients (23.1%); G4, three patients (4.6%); and G5, two patients (3.1%). Thirteen patients received conservative treatment, and 52 underwent revision surgeries. Neurological recovery was as follows: Gr1, 21 patients (32.3%); Gr2, 17 patients (26.2%); Gr3, 20 patients (30.8%); and Gr4, seven patients (10.8%). The prognosis depended on the causes (p =0.041). The subgroup analysis of the revision group revealed a significant correlation between the degree of neurological recovery and the timing of revision, irrespective of causes (r =0.413, p =0.002).

Conclusions: The prognosis of NC depended on the causes. EH was the best and unknown was the worst prognostic factor. Revision should be performed as soon as possible for a better prognosis.

References

Antonacci M, Eismont F . Neurologic complications after lumbar spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9(2):137-45. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200103000-00007. View

HERNDON J, Grillo H, RISEBOROUGH E, Rich Jr J . Compression of the brain and spinal cord following use of gelfoam. Arch Surg. 1972; 104(1):107. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1972.04180010101027. View

Cramer D, Maher P, Pettigrew D, Kuntz 4th C . Major neurologic deficit immediately after adult spinal surgery: incidence and etiology over 10 years at a single training institution. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009; 22(8):565-70. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318193452a. View

Duncan J, Bailey R . Cauda equina syndrome following decompression for spinal stenosis. Global Spine J. 2013; 1(1):15-8. PMC: 3864468. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296051. View

Bridwell K, Lewis S, Edwards C, Lenke L, Iffrig T, Berra A . Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(18):2093-101. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090891.60232.70. View

Lawton M, Porter R, Heiserman J, JACOBOWITZ R, Sonntag V, Dickman C . Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0001. View

Alander D, Stauffer E . Gelfoam-induced acute quadriparesis after cervical decompression and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(8):970-1. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199504150-00016. View

Yadla S, Malone J, Campbell P, Maltenfort M, Harrop J, Sharan A . Early complications in spine surgery and relation to preoperative diagnosis: a single-center prospective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(3):360-6. DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09806. View

Yi S, Yoon D, Kim K, Kim S, Shin H . Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma: risk factor and clinical outcome. Yonsei Med J. 2006; 47(3):326-32. PMC: 2688151. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.3.326. View

10.

Chimenti P, Molinari R . Post-operative spinal epidural hematoma causing American Spinal Injury Association B spinal cord injury in patients with suction wound drains. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013; 36(3):213-9. PMC: 3654447. DOI: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000070. View

11.

Friedman J, Whitecloud 3rd T . Lumbar cauda equina syndrome associated with the use of gelfoam: case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(20):E485-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200110150-00029. View

12.

Ahn D, Shin W, Kim J, Yi S . Why Cannot Suction Drains Prevent Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma?. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016; 8(4):407-411. PMC: 5114253. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.407. View

13.

Sami Walid M, Abbara M, Tolaymat A, Davis J, Waits K, Robinson 3rd J . The role of drains in lumbar spine fusion. World Neurosurg. 2011; 77(3-4):564-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.058. View

14.

Bridwell K, Lenke L, Baldus C, Blanke K . Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients. Incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(3):324-31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00008. View

15.

Epstein N, Silvergleid R, Hollingsworth R . Increased postoperative cervical myelopathy and cord compression resulting from the use of Gelfoam. Spine J. 2008; 9(2):e19-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.009. View