» Articles » PMID: 16807981

Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma: Risk Factor and Clinical Outcome

Overview
Journal Yonsei Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Jun 30
PMID 16807981
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report a series of epidural hematomas which cause neurologic deterioration after spinal surgery, and have taken risk factors and prognostic factors into consideration. We retrospectively reviewed the database of 3720 cases of spine operation in a single institute over 7 years (1998 April- 2005 July). Nine patients who demonstrated neurologic deterioration after surgery and required surgical decompression were identified. Factors postulated to increase the postoperative epidural hematoma and to improve neurologic outcome were investigated. The incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma was 0.24%. Operation sites were cervical 3 cases, thoracic 2 cases, and lumbar 4 cases. Their original diagnoses were tumor 3 cases, cervical stenosis 2 cases, lumbar stenosis 3 cases and herniated lumbar disc 1 case. The symptoms of epidural hematomas were neurologic deterioration and pain. After decompression, clinical outcome revealed complete recovery in 3 cases (33.3%), incomplete recovery in 5 cases (55.6%) and no change in 1 case (11.1%). Factors increasing the risk of postoperative epidural hematoma were coagulopathy from medical illness or anticoagulation therapy (4 cases, 44.4%) and highly vascularized tumor (3 cases, 33.3%). The time interval to evacuation of complete recovery group (29.3 hours) was shorter than incomplete recovery group (66.3 hours). Patients with coagulopathy and highly vascularized tumor were more vulnerable to spinal epidural hematoma. The postoperative outcome was related to the preoperative neurological deficit and the time interval to the decompression.

Citing Articles

Optimal timing for decompression in post-operative epidural hematoma: a retrospective analysis and treatment flowchart.

Chang C, Chen H, Yang F, Hsu C, Yin T, Wu R Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 40047892 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08775-3.


Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Primary Hypercoagulable Disorders.

Avetisian H, Karakash W, Abu-Zahra M, Ezuma C, Athari M, Abdou M Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251316555.

PMID: 39904491 PMC: 11795577. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251316555.


Comparison of Postoperative Epidural Hematoma Formation Between Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Conventional Microscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ham D, Lee J, Kwon B, Yoo Y, Park S, Song K Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(5):533-539.

PMID: 39384336 PMC: 11616404. DOI: 10.14444/8578.


Consensus statement by the Belgian Society of Neurosurgery and literature review on the diagnosis and management of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma.

Smeijers S, Collignon F, Costa E, Desmedt K, Pouleau H, Vantomme N Brain Spine. 2024; 4:103904.

PMID: 39377047 PMC: 11456791. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103904.


Complications of Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis in Lumbar Laminectomy With and Without Fusion.

Stiles E, Chakraborty A, Varghese P, Burapachaisri A, Kim L, Kim Y Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(3):304-311.

PMID: 38902013 PMC: 11535769. DOI: 10.14444/8606.


References
1.
Nawashiro H, Higo R . Contrast enhancement of a hyperacute spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22(7):1445. PMC: 7975220. View

2.
Foo D, Rossier A . Preoperative neurological status in predicting surgical outcome of spinal epidural hematomas. Surg Neurol. 1981; 15(5):389-401. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(81)90178-6. View

3.
Uribe J, Moza K, Jimenez O, Green B, Levi A . Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematomas. Spine J. 2003; 3(2):125-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00535-1. View

4.
Cooper D . Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1967; 26(3):343-5. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1967.26.3.0343. View

5.
Laglia A, Eisenberg R, Weinstein P, Mani R . Spinal epidural hematoma after lumbar puncture in liver disease. Ann Intern Med. 1978; 88(4):515-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-4-515. View